Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NanceGreggs

(27,818 posts)
42. I don't think for a minute ...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:27 PM
Sep 2015

... that the aim was to screw things up - but that has ultimately been the effect.

No doubt the jury system was set up so the site would need less input from Skinner. However, it should have been obvious from the start that personal animosities were going to be an issue - that's just human nature.

The fact that Skinner stated that juries were never expected to enforce the TOS - well, exactly what ARE they supposed to judge questionable posts on? It comes down to individual whims, and often individual likes/dislikes of posters/alerters.

The notion that juries set "community standards" is laughable. How can there be a "standard" when that standard changes from one jury to the next, depending on who's on that jury?

The REAL problem, IMHO, arises from the fact that anyone can post the most vile, anti-Dem, RW bullshit here with very little chance of consequences - because those who post those things are now part of the jury system, and won't vote to "hide" the kind of things they themselves post here.

I truly loved this place when it was a site for Democrats. Now it is no different than any other free-for-all message board. Anyone can post anything - the only difference being that on DU, you have to pretend to be a Democrat while doing so.

At the rate things are going, there won't be anyone left here but the BS supporters, and their RW friends pretending to be BS supporters. And they're welcome to the place. There's nothing here for me anymore.



These are great tools and great advice...Thank you! CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2015 #1
Step 1: Vodka - Step 2: No pants shenmue Sep 2015 #2
Step 3: Pictures Lochloosa Sep 2015 #3
I suggest heavy experimentation...... daleanime Sep 2015 #10
LOL. I suggest trashing the word "trash." Maybe..."refine." I had a different reason for "refining" Hortensis Sep 2015 #26
These steps address major problems in the DU primary discussion process. philly_bob Sep 2015 #4
So ignore the problem? onehandle Sep 2015 #5
My ignore list has grown considerably recently, comparative to where I was before June liberal N proud Sep 2015 #6
I think it is a good idea. I started doing it recently and it does make life better here. CTyankee Sep 2015 #22
As a veteran, I took this advice long before you offered it up. DU sucks much less. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2015 #7
Trashing GD:P or a candidate group is good advice, as is hiding threads. "Ignore" OTOH Gormy Cuss Sep 2015 #8
Thank you. I have been avoiding DU alot because it seems to have been taken over by sometimes Fla Dem Sep 2015 #9
Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #11
I've been on DU for almost 15 years and I've posted less than 500 times! Stainless Sep 2015 #12
juries are a crapshoot, Stainless Skittles Sep 2015 #17
I only lurked during the runup to Obama's nomination - raven mad Sep 2015 #13
Excellent PSA. herding cats Sep 2015 #14
In other words ... NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #15
+ 1000 awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #16
Not sure how you get rid of the elephant in the room, and until it's gone the manure is pretty deep Fla Dem Sep 2015 #19
Thank you. Bobbie Jo Sep 2015 #23
Have I told you lately that I love you? Nance Fricken RANTS! Righteously, too!!!!!! +1,000,000! MADem Sep 2015 #27
"This one used to be like that ..." NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #31
I don't think the changes were done to screw the place over--it was an experiment to give "us" MADem Sep 2015 #35
I don't think for a minute ... NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #42
I can't argue with you because your points are entirely valid. This is no longer a site for MADem Sep 2015 #43
"The culture of this place has been altered." NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #45
Maybe it provides an income stream that is pretty much the same regardless MADem Sep 2015 #46
Ahhhh, Schrafft's!!! NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #47
Again, I can't argue with the points you're making--you are right. MADem Sep 2015 #48
I don't think the changes were done to screw the place over--it was an experiment to give "us" MADem Sep 2015 #35
Remember when criticism of Democrats needed to be "constructive"?... SidDithers Sep 2015 #49
I remember when personal insults were forbidden! Those were the days! nt MADem Sep 2015 #58
"where bashing, trashing and otherwise insulting Democrats is not permitted" JTFrog Sep 2015 #40
Great post Nance Gothmog Sep 2015 #28
Kick and rec this post. zappaman Sep 2015 #29
It's simple, zappaman. NanceGreggs Sep 2015 #32
Thanks Nance. sheshe2 Sep 2015 #34
Excellent rant. n/t JTFrog Sep 2015 #39
+1000000 nt steve2470 Sep 2015 #50
So, you've given up entirely. Good to know. boston bean Sep 2015 #18
I make full use of Ignore and Jury Blacklist... CTyankee Sep 2015 #21
right, butI find it strange that the solution is for members to stay out of open forums by trashing boston bean Sep 2015 #24
those are good suggestions, IMO. Hope you made them in ATA. CTyankee Sep 2015 #25
So essentially create an echo chamber? rainbow fish Sep 2015 #20
as a member of almost 11 years duration, here's my comments steve2470 Sep 2015 #30
Yes! to GROVELBOT, no to advertising emulatorloo Sep 2015 #41
thanks :) nt steve2470 Sep 2015 #44
They were willing to create "Discussionist" to appeal to people on the right. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #53
eh not worth the energy to argue with you, good day nt steve2470 Sep 2015 #54
We have the power to shape our own DU experience? murielm99 Sep 2015 #33
Well said. n/t JTFrog Sep 2015 #38
Everyone has the same tools available to control their own experience her at the DU Capt. Obvious Sep 2015 #37
Thank you! chillfactor Sep 2015 #51
My suggestion or a change to 'ignore' functionality. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #52
EarlG, I have a better idea. Bring back the Mods, and the rule that only constructive criticism of stevenleser Sep 2015 #55
+1 nt steve2470 Sep 2015 #56
So here are a few suggestions for anyone who is feeling burned out... Ptah Sep 2015 #57
Or just be an adult and choose which forums you want to visit and when question everything Oct 2015 #59
Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Announcements»Tips for Surviving Primar...»Reply #42