Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge blocks Seattle from revealing locations of FBI’s hidden cameras on utility poles [View all]beardown
(363 posts)21. So is there a difference between being observed in public and recorded in public?
I don't view being seen in public the same as being filmed and recorded in public.
The latter provides a major capability for abuse and control. The former, not so much.
With recorded media, you can zoom in to see things like cell phone or open wallet type detail. Similar to a guy standing on a second floor balcony in a business district using binoculars to view people as they pay their lunch bill or use their cell phone.
With all of the private cameras on businesses and facilities now, it's almost a mute point.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Judge blocks Seattle from revealing locations of FBI’s hidden cameras on utility poles [View all]
NWCorona
Jun 2016
OP
and apparently in a humorous mood, too. Do you specialize in privacy right case law, btw?
villager
Jun 2016
#30
But the issue I have is what proof do we have that these cameras will be made available
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#22
So is there a difference between being observed in public and recorded in public?
beardown
Jun 2016
#21
Shhh ... How they identified the Boston Bombers is to not be discussed ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#44