This Monday-Friday: Kick in to the DU tip jar!

Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,632 posts)

9. Oh FFS

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2024, 03:41 PM

Apr 16

They weren't peaceful protestors you fucking dumbasses. Remember the barricades set up when they overturned Roe v Wage? Their motto must be, "Protection for me but not for thee."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court seems divided over obstruction charge in Jan. 6 case that may impact Trump, rioters [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Apr 16 OP

Are the fascist 6 divided among themsleves Marthe48 Apr 16 #1

M. Popok had a piece on this Sunday and was convincing bucolic_frolic Apr 16 #2

*The law, signed in 2002, was prompted by accounting fraud and the destruction of documents, elleng Apr 16 #6

They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power Bluethroughu Apr 16 #3

SO IT WAS OKAY? Jimvanhise Apr 16 #4

Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Using Obstruction Law to Charge Jan. 6 Rioters. elleng Apr 16 #5

I would like to see what they think if a couple thousand rioters storms the Supreme Court and they ran for their lives Walleye Apr 16 #7

Was thinking Rebl2 Apr 16 #11

And of course Clarence Thomas recuses madamesilverspurs Apr 16 #8

Oh FFS Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 16 #9

Thomas got his marching orders oasis Apr 16 #10

BOHICA orangecrush Apr 16 #12

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court seems divid...»Reply #9