Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

PortTack

(32,872 posts)

15. Laughable that the insurance faux bond lender "rejected" the NY AG ??!!

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2024, 04:36 PM

Apr 16

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump lawyers acknowledge civil fraud bond was issued without 'certificate of qualification' [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 16 OP

And yet they can continue with their bullshit?.............................. Lovie777 Apr 16 #1

meidastouch channel read from the latest and it appears that Trump pasted the security page for Demsrule86 Apr 16 #7

Don Hankey and Don Hankey Pankey! Mme. Defarge Apr 16 #13

So true...scumbag Don with scumbag lawyers. Demsrule86 Apr 16 #14

So true. And today the AG asked that the court deny Trump's so called bond. Demsrule86 Apr 19 #38

The account control has more holes moniss Apr 16 #17

Oops! TexasBushwhacker Apr 16 #2

That was an internet myth. former9thward Apr 16 #27

Ah! TexasBushwhacker Apr 16 #28

I have no idea what to make of the article. IANAL, but ai hope someone who is Raven123 Apr 16 #3

The article downplays the fact that Trump's side has made a credible argument that the surety can be accepted onenote Apr 16 #5

The bond is based on the backing of a Trump trust that supposedly has money and assets that can convert to money. 58Sunliner Apr 16 #24

Sounds kind of like they simply needed a piece of paper stating that the assets actually exist to cover the judgement. cstanleytech Apr 16 #8

So...a fraudulent bond posted for a fraud trial?! BadgerKid Apr 16 #4

You assume that the surety's legal arguments are without merit. onenote Apr 16 #6

My feeling would be for the surety moniss Apr 16 #12

Do you have experience with reinsurance policies? onenote Apr 16 #31

Yes moniss Apr 17 #35

Great. Can you explain why isn't the reinsurance coverage from KIC is invalid? onenote Apr 17 #36

We have no idea moniss Apr 17 #37

Did you actually listen? Traurigkeit Apr 16 #22

Good one. You can't make this sh*t up. n/t iluvtennis Apr 20 #39

Brothers and sisters, let us delay. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 16 #9

He doesn't have the money. Old Crank Apr 16 #10

NY state law. OK did they abide by NY state law? bluestarone Apr 16 #11

Laughable that the insurance faux bond lender "rejected" the NY AG ??!! PortTack Apr 16 #15

Is Trump's IRS tax audit complete yet? twodogsbarking Apr 16 #16

Two weeks. underpants Apr 16 #26

The certification moniss Apr 16 #18

So Trump and his lawyers filled a fraudulent document so he can appeal his guilt on running a fraudulent business? Botany Apr 16 #19

Just seize the fucking property already. Anything and everything until you reach 500 million. onecaliberal Apr 16 #20

I wonder how much of his and his company's properties are already leveraged to the hilt? Botany Apr 16 #21

I'm sure all of it is. onecaliberal Apr 16 #29

I give up. johnnyfins Apr 16 #23

"her office should be on the hook for the costs "incurred" by forcing their response" Jarqui Apr 16 #25

As I've stated before angrychair Apr 16 #30

Oh shit Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 16 #32

so now they will be given another couple of weeks to provide more proof. Kablooie Apr 16 #33

"Just say you are securing the bond, and let me and my Republican friends do the rest..." kentuck Apr 17 #34