The New Republic
Brynn Tannehill
April 26, 2024
Snip
But the justices did not laugh this argument out of court. Quite the contrary: At least five of the justices seemed to buy into the Trump teams arguments that the power of the office of the president must be protected from malicious and politicized litigation. They were uninterested in the actual case at hand or its consequences. Elie Mystal, justice correspondent at The Nation, perhaps captured my response to the Supreme Courts arguments best: I am in shock that a lawyer stood in the U.S. Supreme Court and said that a president could assassinate his political opponent and it would be immune as an official act. I am in despair that several Justices seemed to think this answer made perfect sense.
At a minimum, it appears the court will send all of the federal cases back down to lower courts to reconsider whether Trumps crimes were official acts. Its also likely that their new definition of official acts is likely to be far broader than anyone should be comfortable with, or at least broad enough to give Trump a pass. This delay all but guarantees that Trump will not stand trial for anything besides the current hush-money case before the 2024 election.
Snip
These justices foolishness lies in their lack of foresight as to what happens if Trump wins in 2024. In the justices efforts to ensure that they are the most powerful branch of government, they are about to make it the weakest. They are creating a win-win situation for Trump, and a lose-lose for themselves. When Trump is president again, he is likely to believe that he has the option of removing any member of the Supreme Court who defies him. As long as the court doesnt rule against him, theyre fine. From the justices perspective, they either end up neutered lap dogs of a despot, who do whatever theyre told out of fear, or they defy him and end up somewhere
unpleasant (at best). Taking a dirt nap at worst. After all, if Trump can rub out a political opponent, cant he do the same to an uncooperative jurist?
Snip
In the end, the court appears to be doing everything to destroy itself, democracy, and the union, with its own arrogance and lack of foresight. Its either castrated itself, and in the process doomed the country, or signed its own death warrant.
More
Pretty chopped up but I tried to post the salient points. Again, a very interesting and chilling read.