Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Poll: Should Deniers Be Allowed To Post In E&E? [View all]defacto7
(13,485 posts)11. There are places for deniers to post.
E&E as a group is better served by discussion of reasonable science between like minded people. I think denier positions are better defined as faith based beliefs and should be kept in speculation oriented groups. The science of man made global warming is quite solid at this point in time and discussions that detract from the facts are just that, distractions and dérailleurs. It's unnecessary for those beliefs to be in every post concerning science, and grinding out the basics of "is it or isn't it" in every discussion isn't helpful for advancing ideas. It hinders.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
I've done much better, I'm just bringing it down to a level that you might understand...
truebrit71
Jun 2014
#22
You have one thing, and one thing only, right. You've brought it down to a level where thought ends.
rug
Jun 2014
#23
My other thought on this is that several of us know exactly who would come back
CreekDog
Jun 2014
#10
You said, "grinding out the basics of "is it or isn't it" in every discussion isn't helpful
tblue37
Jun 2014
#42
climate change denial is facilitating a crime against humanity (and a multitude of other species)
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2014
#21
I agree it should be a TOS issue and it has been included in PPR justifications
CreekDog
Jun 2014
#33
Adults' table was a great tradition so they could carry on serious discussion
lostnfound
Oct 2023
#117
No, "all things" doesn't mean people can post intentionally misleading and unscientific things
CreekDog
Jun 2014
#30
I'm not going to lose any sleep over the fact that several deniers aren't allowed to post here
CreekDog
Jun 2014
#32
Why not just be honest, and make it a protected group with an agenda and a purpose and limitations
MADem
Jun 2014
#38
I think it will solve a lot of problems--it will certainly direct the conversation in a positive
MADem
Jun 2014
#41
Well, he couldn't have claimed that he "didn't know" if the rules are clearly spelled out,
MADem
Jun 2014
#45
The ones who deny reality and prefer to hide behind right wing talking points ...
Nihil
Apr 2015
#71
Yes, we are the party that allows civilized debate even with those who are dead wrong. n/t
SylviaD
Feb 2016
#80
I think that kind of nonsense is probably better suited for, say, creative speculation.
MADem
Oct 2016
#88
All FL Fringe Millennials,XYZ-Gen's obligated vote dem per FL' very real crucial 4x-Env. Crisis's
ZAZMAZ42
Nov 2016
#89
No complete waste of the group's space and purpose. Free to start thier own group
lunasun
Mar 2018
#101
Freedom of Speech wins. Also winning is several types of ignore buttons on DU - such
patricia92243
Apr 2022
#114