Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
38. I'd argue with you but since you believe that "quotas" are required for minorities, let's not
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 04:02 PM
Nov 2013

your false postings about our Civil Rights Act as well as nonsense about the privilege minorities have under the law means that it's pointless to argue with you.

first, we aren't even arguing one liberal to another. second, you aren't grounded in truth.


S_B_Jackson

Response to Reply #1

7. One wonders what our nations laws will look like in such a situation...

the basic presumption of most EEOC laws is that "the norm" is white male. When the they are no longer a majority, can current EEOC laws withstand challenges by now, "minority" white males to similar protected status, and provided the same priviledge, quota, and set-aside programs be provided FOR THEM?
Of course... KansDem Nov 2013 #1
Such a sign is absolutely meaningless in Texas... S_B_Jackson Nov 2013 #37
I'd argue with you but since you believe that "quotas" are required for minorities, let's not CreekDog Nov 2013 #38
With regards to the poll question in this topic S_B_Jackson Nov 2013 #41
I never referred to a sign, are you confused? CreekDog Nov 2013 #42
Kansdem, however did.... S_B_Jackson Nov 2013 #44
yes, gejohnston Nov 2013 #2
Of course, you would have to be a fucking moron to think otherwise. bowens43 Nov 2013 #3
sssshhhhh CreekDog Nov 2013 #7
From one FM to another .... Straw Man Nov 2013 #29
In the state of West Virginia, Staph Nov 2013 #4
No Omnith Nov 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Nov 2013 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Omnith Nov 2013 #8
"Property" is too broad - I'd say the line should be drawn at the boundary petronius Nov 2013 #9
People who bring guns places to commit violence don't give a shit if their prohbited or not davepc Nov 2013 #10
Why exempt law enforcement? n/t oneshooter Nov 2013 #11
By "Prohibition", I take you to mean "should there be a law or laws". NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #12
the poll questions are clear. CreekDog Nov 2013 #13
I didn't see the exception for LEOs at first, iPhone at the time, back at hotel now. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #14
Let individual school districts decide for themselves GreenStormCloud Nov 2013 #15
Pretty much my take, and the law in Texas public schools. Eleanors38 Nov 2013 #20
well that's what my poll asked, why are you struggling so hard? CreekDog Nov 2013 #39
I didn't read the poll correctly. GreenStormCloud Nov 2013 #40
I thought they were already in most states. discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2013 #16
I think the OP wants to see who might like to undo such prohibitions. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #17
Yes but if I had an opinion which I was interested in... discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2013 #18
Been there.... NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #19
too hard a question for you Skip huh? CreekDog Nov 2013 #24
Hey CreekDog! Look, I think the way your wrote the subject line and poll choices is faulty: NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #30
Not waiting by the keyboard for an answer are ya? discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2013 #43
Hell no. I'm still wondering what happened to Robb. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #46
Maybe... discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2013 #47
Oh, My! NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #48
And Toto, too! discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2013 #49
I think bannign a LEO from picking up his kid Jenoch Nov 2013 #21
read the poll/post you're responding to next time CreekDog Nov 2013 #23
I was making a specific point Jenoch Nov 2013 #25
Yes, I noticed the question was too hard for you CreekDog Nov 2013 #27
I never click on any internet 'poll'. Jenoch Nov 2013 #28
In Texas, you can have the gun in the car. GreenStormCloud Nov 2013 #22
The Texas law is how it should be. Jenoch Nov 2013 #31
As long as the gun is out of sight, it can be loaded and easily reachable. N/T GreenStormCloud Nov 2013 #32
It can be, but it might be against the law. Jenoch Nov 2013 #35
In Texas it can be on school grounds, but not in the school building. GreenStormCloud Nov 2013 #36
AB-SO-LUTELY. That's just common sense. eom BlueCaliDem Nov 2013 #26
Minnesota has it about right Oneka Nov 2013 #33
What schools? Bazinga Nov 2013 #34
Given its a public school and the person is complying with carrying/possession laws, I'm ok with it. aikoaiko Nov 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Should visitors to school...»Reply #38