Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In bad, bad need of revision to make it appropriate for today. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2015 #1
Thanks for the reply discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #3
Sure - it was written a few hundred years ago. Militia. Muskets. Totally different country NRaleighLiberal Jul 2015 #5
Interesting perspective discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #8
here's the other issue - differences of culture, opinions, backgrounds. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2015 #17
Some other thoughts discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #24
I've loved this exchange. thanks! if I don't learn something each day, I am disappointed. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2015 #29
Now if only I could have some fried green tomatoes discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #31
I beg to differ. Straw Man Jul 2015 #64
You can have guns rock Jul 2015 #2
Not just guns but "arms". n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #4
And what distinction are you trying to draw? rock Jul 2015 #11
Arms would not be guns when they were some other type of arm discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #14
Very neat! rock Jul 2015 #18
Sorry I don't throw cats discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #25
You left out Minuteman missles. TexasProgresive Jul 2015 #19
People do own tanks and heavy weapons. beevul Jul 2015 #22
I left out a lot but you get the idea discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #27
Black’s Law Dictionary according to discntnt_irny_srcsm (above) rock Jul 2015 #36
It's true discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #37
So the S.A.L.T. agreements were only about weapons a man can carry. TexasProgresive Jul 2015 #42
In the context of... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #49
Protects people's right to own muskets should a militia be needed to protect the U.S. ... Auggie Jul 2015 #6
Why the limit of the musket? n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #9
I was wondering if... discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2015 #65
The precursor to the state National Guards n/t arcane1 Jul 2015 #7
The Bill of Rights discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #10
Protection for the pre-existing individual right to own small arms, petronius Jul 2015 #12
Many people resist that idea discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #15
And there it is. Eleanors38 Jul 2015 #56
A compromise WMDemocract Jul 2015 #13
As I recall it was a compromise and only 10 of the 12 proposed made it discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #32
I think the militia qualification was a "yes, and" and not an "only if" clause. HappyPlace Jul 2015 #16
That's how I read it as well, as far as plain English is concerned: the preface is petronius Jul 2015 #21
Good analogy! HappyPlace Jul 2015 #52
Agreed discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #48
The most misinterpreted Amendment in our Constitution randr Jul 2015 #20
Which is what? N/t beevul Jul 2015 #23
Read it--couldn't be more clear randr Jul 2015 #34
That tells me nothing about what you think it says. N/T beevul Jul 2015 #35
To paraphrase... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #47
That is correct randr Jul 2015 #50
I agree. The government needs the 2nd to fulfill its Article 1 obligations. And I have my own. Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #66
Hear, hear! discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2015 #67
i am pissed the WELL REGULATED IS ALWAYS FORGOTTEN. pansypoo53219 Jul 2015 #26
But it isn't TeddyR Jul 2015 #28
In North America in the last half of the 18th century... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #45
An anachronism Warpy Jul 2015 #30
The Constitution did not forbid standing armies and... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #33
"Should" and "ought" don't work in real life. Warpy Jul 2015 #39
You'd have to ask Teddy Roosevelt, his quote discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #43
He's dead. Warpy Jul 2015 #57
If you say so n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #59
Ouija board tell you that? melm00se Aug 2015 #70
The role of the militia is not to fight foreign wars the band leader Jul 2015 #41
Protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. Nt hack89 Jul 2015 #38
The Second Amendment TeddyR Jul 2015 #40
Prohibits the government from infringing on the inherent and universal right of the people to be Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #44
That pretty much covers it discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #46
don't neccessarily see how 2nd means gun ownership for all w0nderer Jul 2015 #51
"let the flames and hiding this post commence" Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #53
No flaming here. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2015 #54
Welcome to GC & RKBA discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #55
thanks for the welcome w0nderer Jul 2015 #60
"also all for mental checks " beergood Aug 2015 #68
same thing that stops an army (or police) shrink w0nderer Aug 2015 #69
"notice i want training/organization" beergood Aug 2015 #71
The Constitution recognizes enumerated and non-enumerated individual rights. 2A is one... Eleanors38 Jul 2015 #58
Its a restriction on governmental power, which protects rights... beevul Jul 2015 #61
Good one discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #62
Before anything else matters we need to be able to protect ourselves and families. ileus Jul 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»In your opinion, what is ...»Reply #0