Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 07:25 PM Aug 2015

The Racist History of Gun Control....Pt. 1 [View all]

The Black Panther Party in Oakland had been operating what it called Black Panther Police Patrols. The members of the patrol would listen to police scanners and then hustle to the scene of an arrest, where they would remind the suspect of his legal rights. They also showed up armed, because California then was an open-carry state because, of course, freedom.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a21375/don-mulford-makes-history-again/

The article provided above describes the motivations for passage of the Mulford Act in California, which preceded the Gun Control Act of 1968 at the Federal level. Take note of the language used to justify passing the law, and compare that to what is being used today by the gun control special interest groups. The historical origins of contemporary gun control within the United States are filled with racial hatred and bigotry. So much so, gun control was once a Republican issue. Ronald Reagan was perhaps the most effective gun controller of the 20th century, as both POTUS and Governor of California.

***I'm going to make an edit to include some more information on the Black Panther Police Patrols.***
The Panthers' basic ideology was one of armed protection against police oppression: “The key plank of the Panther platform, the one which would shape its history and predetermine its course, was a non-negotiable demand for the immediate end of police harassment and brutality in the black community…indeed, their very name proclaimed a dedication to the concept of armed self-defense.”
...
Newton, his law book in one hand and shotgun in the other, capitalized on every opportunity to demonstrate his command of the streets in front of an audience:

Newton watched the shaky officer approach, surrendering his license as required but refusing to yield any information not demanded by statute.

“What are you doing with the guns?” the patrolman asked, torn between obvious fear and hostility.

“What are you doing with your gun?” Newton countered…

He was in his element, playing to the crowd as he asserted his right to bear arms.


Read more: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ug01/barillari/pantherchap1.html

It should be noted that no law enforcement officers suffered physical violence during the Black Panther Police Patrols and dozens of lives were likely saved from police brutality.

I would like to start an on-going dialogue detailing 150 years of racially motivated legislation and jurisprudence aimed at restricting the right of self defense for minorities and the poor within the United States. This is the first part of that discussion. Feel free to share your observations.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Power is only as untainted as the souls of those who wield it. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #1
Yup, Ronnie Raygun, the father of asinine unconstitutional gun control in America tularetom Aug 2015 #2
Kickin' Faux pas Aug 2015 #3
Nonsense. "...restricting the right of self-defence for minorities and the 'poor'", meaning you want more GUNS, of course. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #4
Yep. salib Aug 2015 #5
The day the Klan messed with the wrong people Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #6
Yep. Fred predicted exactly that post. salib Aug 2015 #8
Fred said it would come from the NRA. The article came from DKos. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #10
No apology for prevaricating, salib? NT pablo_marmol Aug 2015 #21
So, should blacks be denied the right to armed self-defence? Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #34
So where is the part where you affirm the rights of people of color to defend themselves? Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #7
Calm down, Fred. Kang Colby Aug 2015 #9
Double nonsense. Take a breather. The common passive-aggressive voice is more a giveaway than an asset for gun lovers. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #12
Huh? Kang Colby Aug 2015 #13
Good luck Duckhunter935 Aug 2015 #17
Gun control on DU is primarily performance art hack89 Aug 2015 #20
Excellent analysis DonP Aug 2015 #24
Well, I for one prefer Lori Anderson. Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #35
Because the problem is not "too many guns". blueridge3210 Aug 2015 #14
Yep TeddyR Aug 2015 #27
have you noticed that the more you try to take guns away the band leader Aug 2015 #15
Indeed. Kang Colby Aug 2015 #16
This is a really excellent point TeddyR Aug 2015 #26
Bigoted gun control laws are still being passed today.. virginia mountainman Aug 2015 #11
Many of the laws in Northern cities are modeled on Jim (large, raucous black bird) laws... Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #19
An excellent history of racist fun control laws and policies can be found.... Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #18
A *must read* for those truly interested in truth relating to the Civil Rights Movement: pablo_marmol Aug 2015 #22
reagan was pro gun while potus jimmy the one Aug 2015 #23
Hughes Amendment Kang Colby Aug 2015 #25
klang jimmy the one Aug 2015 #28
That doesn't prove Reagan was progun, it proves that the NRA is mendacious friendly_iconoclast Aug 2015 #30
Thanks, Jimmy. Kang Colby Aug 2015 #32
nra = nutty rightwingers armed jimmy the one Aug 2015 #33
start with that racist 2nd amendment jimmy the one Aug 2015 #29
What about the state constitutions that affirm the individual rights Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The Racist History of Gun...»Reply #0