Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
37. Your Uncle Ruckus-isms aside, why should *you* be trusted with guns, and others not?
Tue May 24, 2016, 03:29 PM
May 2016

I've yet to see a explicit rationale from a 'royalist' gun control advocate as to
why *their* gun ownership is more acceptable than another persons, or why their
views on the matter should be encoded into law.

Maybe you'll be the first...

Remember folks... beevul May 2016 #1
This had nothing to do with "gun violence." benEzra May 2016 #2
fpc petition beergood May 2016 #3
More useless feel-good nonsense, while action that could result in change is fumbled! pablo_marmol May 2016 #4
Bullet button loophole...such a phrase makes me sick. Kang Colby May 2016 #5
Spot on, every word. beevul May 2016 #7
I find it intriguing sarisataka May 2016 #9
Yep, they got what they wanted Duckhunter935 May 2016 #11
When I first heard of this legislation, I googled around for more info........ pablo_marmol May 2016 #14
banners wanna ban. ileus May 2016 #6
Wasn't this legislation started sarisataka May 2016 #8
you forgot to mention beergood May 2016 #39
They are out of their... Puha Ekapi May 2016 #10
"However, if they do pass and are signed there could be some ugly backlash......." pablo_marmol May 2016 #15
I can't see... Puha Ekapi May 2016 #16
i agree beergood May 2016 #40
Useless security theater, intended to sway low-information dolts. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #12
Two thumbs up!! pablo_marmol May 2016 #13
Culture War writ-large by open-minded California.... Eleanors38 May 2016 #17
California has long been in the forefront of national changes. flamin lib May 2016 #18
Ummmm.... Puha Ekapi May 2016 #19
It's a mixed bag. Lots of progress on domestic violence gun seizures and UBC as well as some flamin lib May 2016 #20
Curious choice of words for someone who owns so many guns... Marengo May 2016 #21
Not curious at all. Ownership doesn't convey fetishism. flamin lib May 2016 #22
"Fetishism" is not a legal term. Straw Man May 2016 #23
Speaking of reproductive rights, I wonder how well controllers would tolerate arguments against... Marengo May 2016 #33
Would you be willing to surrender your gun rights and your guns at this very moment? Marengo May 2016 #24
I haven't been asked to do so. However, gun rights, like all rights, have limitations. flamin lib May 2016 #25
Then you have a devotion on some level to the right... Marengo May 2016 #26
You bring nothing to this conversation than the usual flamin lib May 2016 #27
I suppose you can supply a quote where I said such a thing... Marengo May 2016 #28
If you wanted to have a real conversation you would not have said the things you have. You don't flamin lib May 2016 #29
What a flaming joke, as if you desire any discussion beyond the beatification of you positions. Marengo May 2016 #31
Game. Set. Match. pablo_marmol May 2016 #34
Yeah, if the game is scored on logical fallacies, made up 'facts', misattributed commentary and flamin lib May 2016 #35
More than a little projection on your part. pablo_marmol May 2016 #36
Your Uncle Ruckus-isms aside, why should *you* be trusted with guns, and others not? friendly_iconoclast May 2016 #37
"Guns for me... Puha Ekapi May 2016 #50
Lunacy, eh? Care to explain that? Marengo May 2016 #53
Look like you have the time to explain what you meant by "lunacy" Marengo Jun 2016 #56
He brings "nothing" to the conversation......... pablo_marmol May 2016 #38
Thats an unknown demographic... beevul Jun 2016 #58
Clearly! NT pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #59
"Just as I can't walk around with a bull horn shouting obscenities as an expression of free speech" beergood May 2016 #42
That is beyond ignorant. Past the obscenity part are noise ordinances, harassment and a host of flamin lib May 2016 #43
the aclu beergood May 2016 #45
" Just as I can't walk around with a bull horn shouting obscenities..." beevul Jun 2016 #57
"when actual voters get the chance things go poorly for gunz." beergood May 2016 #41
The Colorado recall was reversed in the next election. nt flamin lib May 2016 #44
and yet beergood May 2016 #46
The laws passed are still on the books. nt flamin lib May 2016 #47
for now beergood May 2016 #49
For ever. nt flamin lib May 2016 #51
forever times infinity beergood May 2016 #52
In which the GOP won control of the CO Senate- but you still have the gun laws you wanted friendly_iconoclast May 2016 #54
you use fetishists as if its a bad thing beergood May 2016 #48
Ha ha ha......you keep thinking that! pablo_marmol May 2016 #30
Law Enforcement Union Joining the Opposition of Newsom’s Ballot Initiative beergood May 2016 #32
A variety of diverse organizations have joined the fight against Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional beergood May 2016 #55
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»California Senate Passes ...»Reply #37