Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
She's correct. 3 of the final 5 cannot win and can't figure out how to step away. Renew Deal May 2016 #1
they all seem to be banking on their scandalmongering to knock out their rival bigtree May 2016 #31
Excellent point, not only did she drop out but got behind President Obama as hard as she was Thinkingabout May 2016 #2
Got behind Obama and worked hard as SOS. It was a good quid pro quo for her. aikoaiko May 2016 #8
she actually resisted the offer made in December before finally accepting it bigtree May 2016 #12
Right because she wanted the VP slot. aikoaiko May 2016 #13
sad that you're reduced to making charges out of your imagination bigtree May 2016 #15
You can't block me from GD:Primaries, LOL. aikoaiko May 2016 #16
Though the VP is important being SOS is much more involved. Just remember VP's like Dan Quayle Thinkingabout May 2016 #25
I agree, but VPs have historically become President more often. aikoaiko May 2016 #28
In recent years we have had Nixon who was VP to Eisenhower did not follow Eisenhower but ran again Thinkingabout May 2016 #37
adults in the room bigtree May 2016 #18
I hope Sanders proves me wrong BootinUp May 2016 #3
He's a career pro bigtree May 2016 #20
Dear Hillary: ibegurpard May 2016 #4
But wait... Adrahil May 2016 #5
whichever one comes out of your candidate's mouth ibegurpard May 2016 #6
Oh, you're so witty! Adrahil May 2016 #7
I am not at all surprised that you don't know the difference between blind devotion (Authoritarian rhett o rick May 2016 #19
Those rallies didn't translate to votes nt. Trenzalore May 2016 #22
Funny that. I wonder why. Why would you side with the big money of the oligarchy? rhett o rick May 2016 #24
And I'm not surprised that at the continued attacks. Adrahil May 2016 #42
Actually they were. He wasn't going to run initially. puffy socks May 2016 #27
She needs more acting lessons when speaking positively about Bernie and his supporters. aikoaiko May 2016 #9
I'll take her tone bigtree May 2016 #10
Will there be a quid pro quo cabinet position, too? aikoaiko May 2016 #11
that's a demonstratably false accusation bigtree May 2016 #14
It is my accusation to make. If you can demonstrate its false, then go ahead. aikoaiko May 2016 #17
Pres Obama doesn't even like Hillary. It was a political move. rhett o rick May 2016 #21
heh heh bigtree May 2016 #26
Then Hillary stabbed him in the back by consulting with Blumenthal on State business. frylock May 2016 #43
... SidDithers May 2016 #35
I believe she's sincere. joshcryer May 2016 #39
The next thing you know she will be telling us she is against fracking and the TPP rhett o rick May 2016 #23
Hillary is supposed to reach out puffy socks May 2016 #29
I want a fair break for the 99% and they won't get it from Goldman-Sachs. rhett o rick May 2016 #30
You noticed that too eh? It doesn't matter what she does they will find an excuse stevenleser May 2016 #32
I'm going to miss Obama. nt puffy socks May 2016 #33
Indeed. joshcryer May 2016 #40
Thank you. +1 nt NCTraveler May 2016 #34
kick bigtree May 2016 #36
That was gracious on her part. Beacool May 2016 #38
They have such a low opinion if their own "candidate"... joshcryer May 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary: 'It's Hard' To Q...»Reply #26