Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:47 AM May 2016

There is no doubt it's been a tough week for HRC. [View all]

I'm curious if there are any thoughts about why our stenographer media, suddenly got the gumption to ask tough questions and editorialize against her. Whenever I see the media working in sync across multiple platforms and companies I get suspicious.

Was it just the IG report? Is this foreshadowing something to come? I find it strange the WAPO, NEW YORKER, LA Times, AP and many more are now supercriticle, where a week ago they were repeating her talking points and not challenging her weak dismissals. It's a blood in the water feeling but I'm really not sure of the catalyst. All these pundits and insiders turning on her in sync.

Is could be just a case of trying to make a horse race look more exciting for advertising dollars and eyeballs. I have been surprised all week by the corporate non right wing media.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's going to get worse - they smell blood in the water FreakinDJ May 2016 #1
Please, Sanders supporters have been smelling blood in the water for months and he still lost. Trust Buster May 2016 #4
These arnt sanders supporters Jesus Malverde May 2016 #7
You need to differentiale between media nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #41
I think the Democratic voters knew who they were voting for and why. They were not dictated Trust Buster May 2016 #43
Actually no, they didi not nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #44
I disagree. Even Sanders himself claimed in the first debate that he's tired hearing about Trust Buster May 2016 #46
This is *not* about Sanders nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #47
I've read extensively about how the Republican machine tried to tie the Clinton's to scandal Trust Buster May 2016 #49
Alas Counselor that points to motive nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #50
You can talk as cute as you wish. But, that won't change the underlying fact that the voters Trust Buster May 2016 #51
Voters are not part of this *legal equation* nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #52
Thank you for your juris prudence, I just don't agree with your analysis. But, we'll see. Trust Buster May 2016 #53
It is not jurisprudence nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #55
somebody will be looking for a pardon before it is all said and done reddread May 2016 #24
She's our nominee. Some have feigned outrage at the IG report as they will with the FBI report. Trust Buster May 2016 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #6
I know that Sanders supporters are pushing this "voters don't matter" meme. That's because your Trust Buster May 2016 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #10
You sound both hysterical and desperate. Please don't embarrass yourself further. Trust Buster May 2016 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #14
Calm down. You might burst a blood vessel. LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #15
If I question whether Hillary jeopardized national security XemaSab May 2016 #16
????? I didn't even respond to a post of yours. I think you are mistaken. Trust Buster May 2016 #18
Nope. tazkcmo May 2016 #20
She's not my nominee Baobab May 2016 #35
Reading your post is like reading 840high May 2016 #61
I agree... RazBerryBeret May 2016 #3
thing is, it's always been tougher for the Clintons bigtree May 2016 #5
Yea, we got the non-story about Emailgate plus her win in the Trump-Sanders "debate" Tarc May 2016 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #11
Get it right! tazkcmo May 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #19
Is this really your idea of a good week? Jesus Malverde May 2016 #22
Here is how the guardian sums up the week. Jesus Malverde May 2016 #25
Spin Cycle Out of Control pmorlan1 May 2016 #28
I think the part of the week that was good for Hillary. Jesus Malverde May 2016 #29
Thanks 840high May 2016 #62
I think it was the clarity of the IG report that she evaded media oversight karynnj May 2016 #13
The media is craven. They fear going after either party establishment. BillZBubb May 2016 #17
DEVASTATING became the trending word unc70 May 2016 #23
Yeah I head that a lot...nt Jesus Malverde May 2016 #26
Ironically, even the freepers are better informed about these important things... grasswire May 2016 #33
That is for the same reason DU'ers were better infomred nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #59
probably so nt grasswire May 2016 #60
Yeah, the media LOVES the Clintons. Ha! Where have you been for the last 20+ years?!? Metric System May 2016 #27
living in their Paradise. they know who their friends are reddread May 2016 #31
Amazing isn't it. JoePhilly May 2016 #67
They're on her side until she looks like she's going down. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #32
Oh I got a theory... somethgn happened at the watering holes nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34
Not sure I understand your comment?...nt Jesus Malverde May 2016 #37
All reporters have sources nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #38
Completely agree unc70 May 2016 #39
Force is a function of mass and acceleration. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #54
That is certainly one way to describe it nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57
She campaigned being strong on national security, what a joke! This is not going away! B Calm May 2016 #36
Not as tough as next week will be for Bernie Demsrule86 May 2016 #40
And in November you can say hi to President Trump nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #42
She will beat him if anyone can Demsrule86 May 2016 #45
Ok nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #48
I think that this an attempt to get "this" out before the convention CentralMass May 2016 #56
From having seen scandals in the past nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #58
When the Washington Psst (CIA) and the Atlantic (Pentagon, Joint Chiefs) weigh in... Peace Patriot May 2016 #63
I think your on to something. Jesus Malverde May 2016 #64
Sorry Demsrule86 May 2016 #65
"...they have attacked her for years." The FBI? The OIG? John Kerry... Peace Patriot May 2016 #68
Hmm Reid's comment the other day nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #66
.....! Soon more... KoKo May 2016 #69
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There is no doubt it's be...»Reply #0