Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
44. Actually no, they didi not
Sun May 29, 2016, 12:00 AM
May 2016

media did not cover this, the way it has, until now.

There was, oopsie again, that word narrative, a change in the media narrative over the last week that was extremely obvious to anybody who studies or produces media. Mind you, I have covered a scandal, so this is very familiar to me.

And that realization will depress the votes of democrats. This is going, the way this is developing, to lead to a pretty apathetic voting public, who in many cases (primary voters) will be pissed once they realize the problem. She is not a good campaigner to begin with, and YOU CAN GO ARGUE that point with her, since these are her words, almost verbatim.

This is going to hurt her in major ways. Myself and I don't care who emerges from the democratic convention, will not be shocked at all if she does not come out as the nominee. She is lucky that we had a long weekend... you can bet your ass that calls are being made on background right now to try to convince media to change the narrative again, towards a far more friendly narrative;

Her negatives are what, at 14 right now? There is precious little more ground to go to. And these kinds of negatives are considered down right deadly. New to scandals? I'm not.

It's going to get worse - they smell blood in the water FreakinDJ May 2016 #1
Please, Sanders supporters have been smelling blood in the water for months and he still lost. Trust Buster May 2016 #4
These arnt sanders supporters Jesus Malverde May 2016 #7
You need to differentiale between media nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #41
I think the Democratic voters knew who they were voting for and why. They were not dictated Trust Buster May 2016 #43
Actually no, they didi not nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #44
I disagree. Even Sanders himself claimed in the first debate that he's tired hearing about Trust Buster May 2016 #46
This is *not* about Sanders nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #47
I've read extensively about how the Republican machine tried to tie the Clinton's to scandal Trust Buster May 2016 #49
Alas Counselor that points to motive nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #50
You can talk as cute as you wish. But, that won't change the underlying fact that the voters Trust Buster May 2016 #51
Voters are not part of this *legal equation* nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #52
Thank you for your juris prudence, I just don't agree with your analysis. But, we'll see. Trust Buster May 2016 #53
It is not jurisprudence nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #55
somebody will be looking for a pardon before it is all said and done reddread May 2016 #24
She's our nominee. Some have feigned outrage at the IG report as they will with the FBI report. Trust Buster May 2016 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #6
I know that Sanders supporters are pushing this "voters don't matter" meme. That's because your Trust Buster May 2016 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #10
You sound both hysterical and desperate. Please don't embarrass yourself further. Trust Buster May 2016 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #14
Calm down. You might burst a blood vessel. LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #15
If I question whether Hillary jeopardized national security XemaSab May 2016 #16
????? I didn't even respond to a post of yours. I think you are mistaken. Trust Buster May 2016 #18
Nope. tazkcmo May 2016 #20
She's not my nominee Baobab May 2016 #35
Reading your post is like reading 840high May 2016 #61
I agree... RazBerryBeret May 2016 #3
thing is, it's always been tougher for the Clintons bigtree May 2016 #5
Yea, we got the non-story about Emailgate plus her win in the Trump-Sanders "debate" Tarc May 2016 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #11
Get it right! tazkcmo May 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #19
Is this really your idea of a good week? Jesus Malverde May 2016 #22
Here is how the guardian sums up the week. Jesus Malverde May 2016 #25
Spin Cycle Out of Control pmorlan1 May 2016 #28
I think the part of the week that was good for Hillary. Jesus Malverde May 2016 #29
Thanks 840high May 2016 #62
I think it was the clarity of the IG report that she evaded media oversight karynnj May 2016 #13
The media is craven. They fear going after either party establishment. BillZBubb May 2016 #17
DEVASTATING became the trending word unc70 May 2016 #23
Yeah I head that a lot...nt Jesus Malverde May 2016 #26
Ironically, even the freepers are better informed about these important things... grasswire May 2016 #33
That is for the same reason DU'ers were better infomred nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #59
probably so nt grasswire May 2016 #60
Yeah, the media LOVES the Clintons. Ha! Where have you been for the last 20+ years?!? Metric System May 2016 #27
living in their Paradise. they know who their friends are reddread May 2016 #31
Amazing isn't it. JoePhilly May 2016 #67
They're on her side until she looks like she's going down. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #32
Oh I got a theory... somethgn happened at the watering holes nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34
Not sure I understand your comment?...nt Jesus Malverde May 2016 #37
All reporters have sources nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #38
Completely agree unc70 May 2016 #39
Force is a function of mass and acceleration. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #54
That is certainly one way to describe it nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57
She campaigned being strong on national security, what a joke! This is not going away! B Calm May 2016 #36
Not as tough as next week will be for Bernie Demsrule86 May 2016 #40
And in November you can say hi to President Trump nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #42
She will beat him if anyone can Demsrule86 May 2016 #45
Ok nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #48
I think that this an attempt to get "this" out before the convention CentralMass May 2016 #56
From having seen scandals in the past nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #58
When the Washington Psst (CIA) and the Atlantic (Pentagon, Joint Chiefs) weigh in... Peace Patriot May 2016 #63
I think your on to something. Jesus Malverde May 2016 #64
Sorry Demsrule86 May 2016 #65
"...they have attacked her for years." The FBI? The OIG? John Kerry... Peace Patriot May 2016 #68
Hmm Reid's comment the other day nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #66
.....! Soon more... KoKo May 2016 #69
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There is no doubt it's be...»Reply #44