Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)If Clinton Wants To Be President, She Needs To Explain How She Could Make Such A RECKLESS Decision [View all]
Everyone, including Hillary Clinton, now agrees that the newly confirmed secretary of State made a mistake in 2009 when she decided, for the sake of convenience, to run her own email system out of her home in Chappaqua, N.Y., rather than use an official State Department email account.
But a new report by State's inspector general makes clear that within two years, Clinton's bad decision had turned into something far worse: a threat to national security, one that she repeatedly ignored despite multiple warnings.
Warning No. 1: The report, released last week, reveals that in January 2011, hackers were attacking her private server. Twice, the Hillary and Bill Clinton staffer responsible for maintaining the server had to shut it off to protect data held by America's top diplomat and the former president. The staffer notified State Department officials of the attempted hack, and Clintons top aides there emailed each other to say that sensitive matters should not be discussed with Clinton over email.
Warning No. 2: Two months later, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security sent a memorandum on cybersecurity threats directly to Clinton, warning of a dramatic increase in efforts "to compromise the private home email accounts of senior department officials" in a likely attempt to "gain access to policy documents and personal information that could enable technical surveillance and possible blackmail. The memo to Clinton warned her that some personal email accounts had already been compromised and had been reconfigured to automatically forward copies of all composed emails to the hackers.
More @ Link:http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/30/hillary-clinton-email-server-inspector-general-editorials-debates/85159948/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
115 replies, 6253 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (58)
ReplyReply to this post
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Clinton Wants To Be President, She Needs To Explain How She Could Make Such A RECKLESS Decision [View all]
AzDar
May 2016
OP
And kids this is what we call a new media narrative, and unlike the old one
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#1
I wonder if we took a collection to match the salary Brock pays people, plus a bonus, if they would
Voice for Peace
May 2016
#92
Fmr. AG Eric Holder still thinks Snowden should be prosecuted despite no actual demonstrated damage
JonLeibowitz
May 2016
#13
I am not implying that at all. It was perfectly clear what I meant by my post.
JonLeibowitz
May 2016
#19
Go talk to someone in the intelligence community. . . you are just babbling here.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#95
I know of no one over the age of 25 who has never broken a law or rule or maternal order.
Tal Vez
May 2016
#54
Clever, but wrong. Even when he spoke of her "damn emails", he noted it was under investigation
karynnj
May 2016
#100
There is no way to convince you and there is no way you can convince me it is insignificant
karynnj
May 2016
#105
I keep seeing you post this... Utter lack of anything clever to post? Bill Clinton diagnosis?
AzDar
May 2016
#16
Even if he did win by default because of an indictment, it wouldn't validate him
KingFlorez
May 2016
#28
"Please GOD, Let Hillary be indicted so that your son Bernie can be the nominee!"
KingFlorez
May 2016
#25
Sanders needs to explain why he reckless made the decision five times to vote against
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#59
Really, they clarify "cult of personality" for me. NATIONAL SECURITY means nothing
pdsimdars
May 2016
#96
many of her decisions are reckless, OR calculated bomb Libya,obstruct Peace accord in Syria, support
amborin
May 2016
#62
It wasn't "reckless." It may have been against the State Department rules but it was far from
Jitter65
May 2016
#63
Go bother someone else. Like I said, go learn something. You are really uninformed.
pdsimdars
May 2016
#114
I don't think she or her supporters believe she needs to explain anything.
EndElectoral
May 2016
#110