Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
Mon May 30, 2016, 07:34 PM May 2016

If Clinton Wants To Be President, She Needs To Explain How She Could Make Such A RECKLESS Decision [View all]



Everyone, including Hillary Clinton, now agrees that the newly confirmed secretary of State made a mistake in 2009 when she decided, for the sake of “convenience,” to run her own email system out of her home in Chappaqua, N.Y., rather than use an official State Department email account.

But a new report by State's inspector general makes clear that within two years, Clinton's bad decision had turned into something far worse: a threat to national security, one that she repeatedly ignored despite multiple warnings.

Warning No. 1: The report, released last week, reveals that in January 2011, hackers were attacking her private server. Twice, the Hillary and Bill Clinton staffer responsible for maintaining the server had to shut it off to protect data held by America's top diplomat and the former president. The staffer notified State Department officials of the attempted hack, and Clinton’s top aides there emailed each other to say that “sensitive” matters should not be discussed with Clinton over email.

Warning No. 2: Two months later, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security sent a memorandum on cybersecurity threats directly to Clinton, warning of a dramatic increase in efforts "to compromise the private home email accounts of senior department officials" in a likely attempt to "gain access to policy documents and personal information that could enable technical surveillance and possible blackmail.” The memo to Clinton warned her that some personal email accounts had already been compromised and had “been reconfigured … to automatically forward copies of all composed emails” to the hackers.


More @ Link:http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/30/hillary-clinton-email-server-inspector-general-editorials-debates/85159948/

115 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And kids this is what we call a new media narrative, and unlike the old one nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #1
Clinton has never had a pass. Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #4
LMAO nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #5
This poster is quite funny. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #9
I do not put anybody on ignore, but you are correct, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #10
So comedic you'd think "he" must be very popular on the outside... JudyM May 2016 #22
Well I don't blame working stiffs for paying the bills. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #23
Either that or maybe just truly sadly unpopular in the real world... JudyM May 2016 #26
I'm pretty sure he's answering a different call... opiate69 May 2016 #32
Yep. Pretty shallow water in that bay. JudyM May 2016 #46
Cousin by marriage! LOL! How dare Weaver have been born into that family! merrily May 2016 #77
I wonder if we took a collection to match the salary Brock pays people, plus a bonus, if they would Voice for Peace May 2016 #92
A champion for the Iraq War. Broward May 2016 #24
Out of curiosity, what did she successfully fight for, in your opinion? IdaBriggs May 2016 #31
naming inanimate objects. Congress laughed at her larkrake May 2016 #68
She needs to stop creating 840high May 2016 #88
Uh huh pinebox May 2016 #98
I was going to allude to that very point Babel_17 May 2016 #78
The media is also not happy nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #81
Nobody cares except the GOP and the 'Not Hillary' Party. nt onehandle May 2016 #2
And the FBI, DC office to be specific nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6
Except... we do. LP2K12 May 2016 #11
and many of us who know our President must be a person with elleng May 2016 #56
Laughable on its face! Y'all look foolish with that line. morningfog May 2016 #102
Ho-frikkin-Hum apcalc May 2016 #3
Hard to talk with your head in the sand... AzDar May 2016 #8
Poor judgement? Arrogance? pscot May 2016 #7
Poor judgment works for me. elleng May 2016 #57
I might find this whole email situation more important Tal Vez May 2016 #12
Fmr. AG Eric Holder still thinks Snowden should be prosecuted despite no actual demonstrated damage JonLeibowitz May 2016 #13
Poor Mr. Snowdon Tal Vez May 2016 #17
I am not implying that at all. It was perfectly clear what I meant by my post. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #19
No harm no foul, it seems. Tal Vez May 2016 #34
You're okay with her LIES about it, then? At the VERY LEAST, I mean... AzDar May 2016 #45
I know that you didn't know this about me, but Tal Vez May 2016 #52
... AzDar May 2016 #55
Hillary lied. Period. pinebox May 2016 #99
... AzDar May 2016 #69
Go talk to someone in the intelligence community. . . you are just babbling here. pdsimdars May 2016 #95
Wow... I mean.... opiate69 May 2016 #20
lol, indeed. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #37
Patreus was charged for "leaking" code books jeff47 May 2016 #43
You're absolutely right. Tal Vez May 2016 #49
No, you've violated the law, not a rule. jeff47 May 2016 #50
I know of no one over the age of 25 who has never broken a law or rule or maternal order. Tal Vez May 2016 #54
Yea Sanders was wrong. TimPlo May 2016 #74
Well, you say that Sanders was wrong, Tal Vez May 2016 #79
bernie is focused on the issues - they are his priorities. hopemountain May 2016 #83
I agree that Bernie has tried to focus on important issues. Tal Vez May 2016 #85
Yes, is this a management issue for Sanders? Arneoker May 2016 #93
I agree completely. Tal Vez May 2016 #101
Clever, but wrong. Even when he spoke of her "damn emails", he noted it was under investigation karynnj May 2016 #100
If you want to convince me that I should consider this issue Tal Vez May 2016 #103
There is no way to convince you and there is no way you can convince me it is insignificant karynnj May 2016 #105
We have to make our own decisions. Tal Vez May 2016 #106
you left out the "r" hopemountain May 2016 #82
You're right I did leave out the "r" (by accident, I assure you). Tal Vez May 2016 #84
trust the process, i always say hopemountain May 2016 #87
I agree with your elders. Tal Vez May 2016 #89
Top secret documents lmbradford May 2016 #72
I think I get the gist. Tal Vez May 2016 #75
Hard Hitting Editorial pmorlan1 May 2016 #14
*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP*CLAP* Tarc May 2016 #15
I keep seeing you post this... Utter lack of anything clever to post? Bill Clinton diagnosis? AzDar May 2016 #16
The same, tired propping up of Emailgate as a viable issue Tarc May 2016 #18
Just watching the multiple investigations unfold... Thanks for the kick! AzDar May 2016 #21
Even if he did win by default because of an indictment, it wouldn't validate him KingFlorez May 2016 #28
The poster claps when he/she really likes something and approves of it! nt grasswire May 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author ljm2002 May 2016 #107
"Please GOD, Let Hillary be indicted so that your son Bernie can be the nominee!" KingFlorez May 2016 #25
Full of crap. elleng May 2016 #30
Honey, I read it, so save it KingFlorez May 2016 #33
I'm not your darling, you're no honey, elleng May 2016 #39
...and they think they are convincing us to vote for Hillary. grasswire May 2016 #44
Sure does. elleng May 2016 #53
None Blinder Than Those Who REFUSE To See... AzDar May 2016 #40
Indeed, elleng May 2016 #42
+1 bravenak May 2016 #76
Yup, Hillary Clinton Broke the Rules: our view. elleng May 2016 #27
Why....? beachbumbob May 2016 #29
because: elleng May 2016 #36
This is from USA Today. They are owned by Gannett. IdaBriggs May 2016 #38
It's an op-ed piece annavictorious May 2016 #48
It's from their EDITORIAL BOARD. That means something. IdaBriggs May 2016 #51
No, it was not previously done by other SOS. jeff47 May 2016 #47
Please stop spreading misinformation... ljm2002 May 2016 #108
Hillary Lannister must be made to walk a Gauntlet of Shame LuvLoogie May 2016 #35
people should care Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #58
Sanders needs to explain why he reckless made the decision five times to vote against Thinkingabout May 2016 #59
Look! Over There! A False Tu Quoque Argument! AzDar May 2016 #60
Were you successful in changing his voting record, don't think so. Thinkingabout May 2016 #65
... AzDar May 2016 #66
This. Guns are more dangerous... scscholar May 2016 #67
So in other words... ljm2002 May 2016 #111
She doesn't have to explain anything. politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #61
and don't care, apparently, elleng May 2016 #71
Really, they clarify "cult of personality" for me. NATIONAL SECURITY means nothing pdsimdars May 2016 #96
many of her decisions are reckless, OR calculated bomb Libya,obstruct Peace accord in Syria, support amborin May 2016 #62
It wasn't "reckless." It may have been against the State Department rules but it was far from Jitter65 May 2016 #63
I HOPE you are being facetious... AzDar May 2016 #64
So State computers allowed remote desktop operations? ljm2002 May 2016 #112
I want to know... Skid Rogue May 2016 #70
Go read something and learn something before your free association nonsense. pdsimdars May 2016 #97
LMAO! Once again... Skid Rogue May 2016 #104
Go bother someone else. Like I said, go learn something. You are really uninformed. pdsimdars May 2016 #114
You make me smile. :) Skid Rogue May 2016 #115
Military ops lmbradford May 2016 #73
You may be thinking of this Art_from_Ark May 2016 #90
She just is one of those people who make bad decisions emsimon33 May 2016 #80
Our Lady Of Poor Judgement... AzDar May 2016 #86
Yes, elleng May 2016 #91
That would be "such a reckless decision WITH NATIONAL SECURITY!!" pdsimdars May 2016 #94
Not "A" reckless decision. A SERIES of reckless decisions. lagomorph777 May 2016 #109
I don't think she or her supporters believe she needs to explain anything. EndElectoral May 2016 #110
She's made more than ONE reckless decision. JUDGEMENT Triana May 2016 #113
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Clinton Wants To Be Pr...»Reply #0