Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
No argument here SCantiGOP Aug 2016 #1
Yep. They went full GOP bravenak Aug 2016 #2
Who got more Democratic votes in Florida... tonedevil Aug 2016 #3
The Swiftboat PAC in 2004 didn't get many votes either. DanTex Aug 2016 #7
Point out where I defended... tonedevil Aug 2016 #8
You defended Nader, denying that he pushed W to the presidency. Why? DanTex Aug 2016 #10
If that is defending to you... tonedevil Aug 2016 #12
Nader was a decisive factor. I have no love for Bush, of course, and I will criticize DanTex Aug 2016 #13
The first 10,000 tonedevil Aug 2016 #14
The vast majority of posts here attack Trump/Republicans. BzaDem Aug 2016 #57
Nader had nothing to do with Bush winning Florida. it baffles me that Exilednight Aug 2016 #63
Nader had everything to do with it. No Nader, and Gore wins. There's no denying that. DanTex Aug 2016 #78
If those people do not vote, how does it change Gore's vote count? Exilednight Aug 2016 #87
More to Gore than Bush, putting him over the top. DanTex Aug 2016 #93
There's NO PROOF that the Green party people would have even voted. Exilednight Aug 2016 #95
Not all of them, but enough to comfortably make the election SCOTUS-proof. DanTex Aug 2016 #97
DanTex that is an excellent and precise summary. May I have your permission to use it when needed? Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #98
Thank you! Of course, yes, use it as you will, no credit necessary. DanTex Aug 2016 #99
8% of registered Democrats voted for Bush in 2000. Why blame Nader when Exilednight Aug 2016 #106
I blame them also. But Nader was a decisive factor, and had much more impact DanTex Aug 2016 #107
1 out of every 13 registered Democrats voted for Bush, and yet the Exilednight Aug 2016 #115
The blame goes to the person, Nader, who campaigned against Gore and intentionally DanTex Aug 2016 #116
My point is simple, Democrats don't scapegoat others for their failures. Exilednight Aug 2016 #119
It's not scapegoating, it's recognizing enemies and treating them as such. DanTex Aug 2016 #120
I have no problem with going after Stein on those issues. Exilednight Aug 2016 #121
It is a fact that Nader was a decisive factor in the 2000 campaign. He wasn't the only factor, DanTex Aug 2016 #122
He also lied about Gore. LisaM Aug 2016 #130
The Green are running ads in swing states Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #65
I've even seen a Stein ad once in Illinois. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2016 #82
Who is paying for this? nt Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #90
Unfortunately, I missed that part as I was rolling my eyes. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2016 #92
Well actually, we don't know yet who's paying for them. The ads are from her campaign, but Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #101
Ralph Nader on Trump and Hillary: Downtown Hound Aug 2016 #4
He said that? SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #26
Especially when the "perfect" start praising Donald Freakin' Trump. n/t Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #102
ok...that does it... the greens are assholes uponit7771 Aug 2016 #66
For me the question is are they spoilers? bluedye33139 Aug 2016 #5
Uh, that's not the definition of spoiler, to me. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #28
Uh, fair enough bluedye33139 Aug 2016 #46
Running ads in swing states where a couple of points could make the difference Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #67
Yep. nt SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #79
Agreed rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #6
^this Democrats Ascendant Aug 2016 #15
Why Johnny2X2X Aug 2016 #9
As the polls stand now, they aren't a factor. DanTex Aug 2016 #11
I'm terrified right now. nt SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #34
Greens weren't supposed to be a factor in 2000, either. Were you around then? VOX Aug 2016 #16
Yep. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #35
Yep. And that phoney war? Wilms Aug 2016 #38
I'm not sure if you're with me or against me, from this one post. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #41
Mere speculation. chwaliszewski Aug 2016 #40
Wrong... StraightRazor Aug 2016 #52
Look at the threads on the first couple pages PatSeg Aug 2016 #19
They could be. And that must not happen. nt SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #29
Who does Putin love more? EricMaundry Aug 2016 #17
Kick... fleabiscuit Aug 2016 #18
So, let me get this straight . . FairWinds Aug 2016 #20
I was here for primaries and PatSeg Aug 2016 #21
What is this mysterious "GD" of which you speak, Kemos Havee ? FairWinds Aug 2016 #22
Oh, it is just the regular PatSeg Aug 2016 #44
I'll tell you why I'm even paying attention to third parties. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #25
That part I understand Susan PatSeg Aug 2016 #45
Beware too of men who flatter with insincere praise, it's a bulling tactic to "keep little ladies Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #105
Totally agree. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #23
The continuing out of context and overwrought bashing of the Greens is effectively click bait. Ford_Prefect Aug 2016 #24
Totally agree with GOTV. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #30
The point is not to waste energy on them, or turn us into one more hateful blog. Ford_Prefect Aug 2016 #37
I'm not willing to take the chance. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #39
I gues then maybe the political whore Stein Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #71
I thought... tonedevil Aug 2016 #113
She is a political whore in that she sells Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #123
I thought... tonedevil Aug 2016 #124
I will not argue with you about this...she is green and a opponent and I can say what I want Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #125
As to the primary... tonedevil Aug 2016 #127
Right... Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #132
I don't think I said... tonedevil Aug 2016 #133
They deserve it and then some. SunSeeker Aug 2016 #27
They were actual GOP ratfuckers in Arizona in 2008 sweetloukillbot Aug 2016 #31
That is disgusting. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #33
Here sweetloukillbot Aug 2016 #42
Thanks. Might you make this an OP? nt SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #48
Anything that has even the possibility of taking votes away from Hillary SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #32
We need to keep them out of our convention next time too! redstatebluegirl Aug 2016 #36
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2016 #70
When there's a post pointing out how well Clinton is doing, we're warned not to be complacent. betsuni Aug 2016 #43
Yep. That worries me. nt SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #49
And we hear how compromising with Republicans is evil. randome Aug 2016 #84
K&R Gothmog Aug 2016 #47
A Green post is a Libertarian post is a Republican post SwankyXomb Aug 2016 #50
Nader didn't cost Gore the election in 2000... StraightRazor Aug 2016 #51
Yes, he did. In his 95K Florida votes he took far more votes from progressives in Florida pnwmom Aug 2016 #58
So what you are saying is that progressives do not deserve to vote despite the Constitution? Ford_Prefect Aug 2016 #60
Overt strawman, no one is talking about right to vote its best choice for the country uponit7771 Aug 2016 #68
Yes he did...and the Greens bashed Gore for a year Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #72
Nader did not even support the Green platform when he ran bluedye33139 Aug 2016 #77
I agree. nt Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #91
If you think this is bullying, then you've never been bullied. athena Aug 2016 #88
You mistake concience for spoiled, prideful ego. Voting for 3rd party when you know vulnerable Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #111
"We can disagree without being disagreeable" -- Barack Obama nt Gore1FL Aug 2016 #53
I dont' want to. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #73
That doesn't mean calling them names and otherwise disparaging them is a good idea. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #75
A Green voter is a Trump voter, both deserving of the same. Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #104
If they were a Trump voter they would be voting for Trump. Gore1FL Aug 2016 #109
537 votes separated Gore and * as per the certified vote count for FL. That Guy 888 Aug 2016 #54
Nader received 95K votes in Florida. If only 1 out of every 190 votes he got switched to Gore.... scheming daemons Aug 2016 #55
Gore certified the election results for FLORIDA That Guy 888 Aug 2016 #56
That is irrelevant to who was inaugurated. BzaDem Aug 2016 #59
They couldn't have done it without republican election fraud. That Guy 888 Aug 2016 #117
So what? Nader could have single-handed prevented Bush. He chose not to. n/t BzaDem Aug 2016 #118
Try reading the post instead of going for the easy DNC approved answer. n/t That Guy 888 Aug 2016 #131
He wouldn't have been put in that position except that Nader drew 95K votes after purposely pnwmom Aug 2016 #62
Is there any source of Nader crowing about this? I didn't come to a decision on Greens until uponit7771 Aug 2016 #69
I remember this press conference and how sickening it was to watch him. pnwmom Aug 2016 #103
Wow... this line says it all uponit7771 Aug 2016 #108
If they all stayed at home and didn't vote for down-ballot Democrats what would have happened? nt Gore1FL Aug 2016 #76
But Nader got 95,000 in Florida. Even with the hanging chads and other issues, pnwmom Aug 2016 #61
And Bush got nearly 350,000 Democratic votes. progressoid Aug 2016 #110
How about beating Gore up everyday for a year? Yeah that was the Greens and Nader. Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #74
That is exactly right Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #64
The Greenies are defending Nader and the 2000 election Gothmog Aug 2016 #80
Bravo rjsquirrel Aug 2016 #85
Amen. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2016 #81
I have zero respect for those grifters. joshcryer Aug 2016 #83
I pity the young ones, the naive and the simple who are fleeced of their money. I have Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #114
K&R! stonecutter357 Aug 2016 #86
Some of them , I assume, are good people. n/t Orsino Aug 2016 #89
tl;dr Capt. Obvious Aug 2016 #94
I see the usual suspects showed up to tell us to "leave Jill alooooooooooneeeeee" Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #96
K&R! DemonGoddess Aug 2016 #100
More fight club? Rex Aug 2016 #112
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #126
Hi, how's your summer been? uppityperson Aug 2016 #129
They're just a pack of Joe Lieberman's*, if you ask me. TonyPDX Aug 2016 #128
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Green Party deserves ...»Reply #86