Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Which candidate would be most effective on climate change - mitigation AND coping with consequences [View all]
I'm freaked out by the droughts in California - our #1 agriculture state - and the other parts of the world that are turning into deserts.
Our next president needs to push for sustainable energy and work to reduce climate change, but also needs to fairly deal with the consequences of it as they appear.
What candidates are most likely to do that? And why?
11 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Hillary Clinton | |
0 (0%) |
|
Bernie Sanders | |
11 (100%) |
|
Martin o'malley | |
0 (0%) |
|
Jim Webb | |
0 (0%) |
|
Lincoln Chafee | |
0 (0%) |
|
One of the Republicans (ROFL) | |
0 (0%) |
|
Other | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which candidate would be most effective on climate change - mitigation AND coping with consequences [View all]
lostnfound
Jul 2015
OP
Clinton has more friends in Congress; she will do a better job wrangling votes/herding cats. nt
MADem
Jul 2015
#2
how is perpetual war, fracking, corporatism, and Keystone any different from the Pub candidates?
MisterP
Jul 2015
#16