Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: There are only 3 reasons to have voted for the IWR. They are all contemptible [View all]delrem
(9,688 posts)143. No. Some of the largest demonstrations IN HISTORY were mounted against the Iraq war.
The opposition was WORLD WIDE.
Everyone with any conscience at all knew the war was coming, and that it was WRONG. It was ILLEGAL. It was BASED IN LIES.
Don't you try to re-write history and pretend that all of us who were aghast at what was happening, what was about to happen, the sheer depravity of it, didn't exist. Don't exist. Just because you happened to be clueless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_15,_2003_anti-war_protest
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are only 3 reasons to have voted for the IWR. They are all contemptible [View all]
cali
Aug 2015
OP
Al Gore warned against it and this USA Today article supports your contention.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#134
I voted for Kerry, and I'll hold my nose and vote for Hillary if she's the Democratic candidate.
Scuba
Aug 2015
#8
oh god. even I here in the boondocks knew what this was. how can ANYONE get a pass or be
roguevalley
Aug 2015
#15
I think the only body parts and fluids on the minds of critics of the Iraq War were....
Armstead
Aug 2015
#93
I have no problem with DU members (or others) pointing out the flaws in our candidates.
Scuba
Aug 2015
#16
She's the frontrunner. If she can't stand the heat she's welcome to get out of the kitchen.
Scuba
Aug 2015
#26
It's a discussion board. People enjoy discussing politics, including things that have been ...
Scuba
Aug 2015
#92
You got that right...I think Hillary was wrong to vote for the IWR on all three counts. No excuse for it.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Aug 2015
#78
I don't think you're going to have to hold your nose this time. The people will decide this time
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#105
I hope you're correct, but the way the DNC has rigged the systems troubles me greatly.
Scuba
Aug 2015
#110
True, but this time, look how much flack they are getting. Remember when Kucinich was running
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#111
I think Bernie has a better chance of winning the GE than Hillary. And it's my opinion that ...
Scuba
Aug 2015
#112
They were all in #3. Wanted to look hawkish to combat the Dem weak-on-defense rap for their
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#9
Obviously wrong now, but some thought it would strengthen Prez's hand & would not lead to invasion.
Hoyt
Aug 2015
#6
No one voted on war, as a matter of fact, they all stated opposition to war.
SonderWoman
Aug 2015
#12
Now one of the qualifications to be elected to Congress is being clairvoyant?
George II
Aug 2015
#107
Joint Resolution To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq .
whopis01
Aug 2015
#37
I'm against war But I'm going to give George Bush, GEORGE BUSH, my blessing to wage it
Armstead
Aug 2015
#48
the name of the bill was Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002....
mike_c
Aug 2015
#117
i agree. a whole lot of history and discussion left out. this is one i do not even bother with on
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#60
We needed leadership on that vote. We didn't get it. I was disgusted and furious at everyone who
Hissyspit
Aug 2015
#128
i understand. though i disagree. what would have been in losing the senate and house seats.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#129
If I had to assign a reason for Clinton's vote, I'd go with number 3, and quite possibly number 2
PatrickforO
Aug 2015
#36
Yes. They feared the war would go quickly and that their "no" votes would be used against them
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2015
#56
you are wrong. there are other reasons, but then one would have to not have agenda and an ability
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#55
i would never and have never had this conversation on du. this one, it is like talking to the
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#63
Your secret reasons are like Trumps secret plans "trust me it's wicked smart"
Exultant Democracy
Aug 2015
#72
thre is nothing secret about my reason, just not a conducive conversation to be had on du.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#83
i wont bother cause it is a waste of time. i do not know why it is so challenging for you to
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#89
Yet posting about it isn't a waste of time, just posting about the specifics.
Exultant Democracy
Aug 2015
#96
you can read my other posts as we pretend of this game, secret. but why bother, right?
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#120
This comment seems full of passive aggressive condescension and false superiority.
Bubzer
Aug 2015
#144
News flash: The people who died because of that vote haven't come back from the dead
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2015
#67
No. Some of the largest demonstrations IN HISTORY were mounted against the Iraq war.
delrem
Aug 2015
#143
Wrong. And this is why Senators Kerry, Biden, and Clinton, among other Democrats,
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#79
That's true. Most Dems knew that there would be just enough votes to allow for its passage.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#91
You mean 4. Taking Bush's assessment re: inspection over Hans Blix's.
Exultant Democracy
Aug 2015
#88
Excellent response - stripped the rhetoric away to expose the substance and reality. Thanks!
George II
Aug 2015
#108
Great post. THIS should be the thread topic, not the simplistic one we have. (NT)
PBass
Aug 2015
#132
Or, you could have been drunk or incompetent, which covers about 50% of Republicans.
GoneFishin
Aug 2015
#104