Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 03:49 PM Dec 2015

Should we consider rightwing sources and smears posted here to attack Democratic candidates [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by BooScout (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

a violation of community standards?

I think we should. How about you?


8 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Poll closed
Yes I will vote to hide such posts, no matter which Democratic candidate they attack.
6 (75%)
Yes I will vote to hide such posts, but only if they attack my Democratic candidate.
0 (0%)
No I will not vote to hide such posts.
2 (25%)
This is disruptive meta, why don't the hosts do something!
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Too many people view posting videos of a candidate speaking as a smear & attack peacebird Dec 2015 #1
+1 marym625 Dec 2015 #2
Indeed. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #13
Videos are fine as long as they're not Republican ads. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #24
Well, its been happening since the candidates entered the race. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #3
Often yes, sometimes no. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #4
LOL - his campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #5
So? angrychair Dec 2015 #8
You linked to a racist right wing website and now you're defending it? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #21
Only if we're attacking Bernie Renew Deal Dec 2015 #6
21 recs for a thread linking to a racist tea party website say otherwise. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP Dec 2015 #41
There's a ton of hypocrisy in the response Renew Deal Dec 2015 #44
To be fair some do speak up when HRC is attacked by rw sources but hrmjustin Dec 2015 #48
That for damn sure! ronnykmarshall Dec 2015 #57
I thought posting from RW sources was a TOS violation, if used as a credible reference. TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #7
One problem is that many sources are called rightwing if they happen to have a critical article peacebird Dec 2015 #17
A Jim Hoff website? Especially after it was pointed out as being from that site? TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #18
Who is Jim Hoff, & why would you reply to my post with that? peacebird Dec 2015 #19
Because that's what this thread is really about... SidDithers Dec 2015 #39
And yet 'many' is not me. I find that shite revolting, and progressivestoday is a Democrat bashing Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #46
Only in general angrychair Dec 2015 #9
I know what this post is referring to. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #10
That would be up to individual jurors to decide if a post MineralMan Dec 2015 #11
Obvious is obvious. Community standards are what we - the community - decide they are. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #25
I disagree. It's not disruptive meta to post a poll asking for opinions. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #31
We shouldn't link to hate sites - but if a clip is posted of a candidate saying something without Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #12
HAHAHA GOODMAN! JaneyVee Dec 2015 #14
Didn't you link to Stormfront in an effort to smear a Jewish candidate? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #22
hey the nazis aren't always wrong about everything! Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #27
Isn't it? The hypocrisy is staggering. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #28
I did! Because another poster told me (<-a Jew) to go over to Stormfront! JaneyVee Dec 2015 #36
No, you claimed they support Bernie and linked to them to "prove" your theory. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #37
tuff question during election times olddots Dec 2015 #15
So we can count on you to knock down right wing smears on HRC? MaggieD Dec 2015 #16
Well we know we can count on you to post rightwing smears and to proudly defend doing so. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #26
I don't get what people who post those hope to accomplish. Avalux Dec 2015 #20
No, all sides are guilty of it but the one cited today by a HC supporter is especially vile. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #23
I asked skinner once in ata and he said as long as a jury keeps it, it is ok. hrmjustin Dec 2015 #29
The mods would have deleted it on DU2. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #30
Note that the ProgressiveToday post was alerted... SidDithers Dec 2015 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP Dec 2015 #40
It was alerted on because it was a smear. Vattel Dec 2015 #45
I totally see why they hate you so much, Sid Number23 Dec 2015 #50
Hey you... SidDithers Dec 2015 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #33
which right wing? reddread Dec 2015 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP Dec 2015 #38
The HRC group has repeatedly linked to David Horowitz' website. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #43
Thus, you consider the NYT a "rigth wing" source question everything Dec 2015 #58
What are you on about now? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #59
what is with you and the clickty clicks? rbrnmw Dec 2015 #62
You read those despicable smears and you're upset that I wasn't polite enough to the posters? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author rbrnmw Dec 2015 #65
I don't make antidemocracy pledges. 99Forever Dec 2015 #42
Well, I hope this means that the next time I alert on the poster who keeps linking to a fascist Starry Messenger Dec 2015 #47
+1 joshcryer Dec 2015 #49
See Sid's post #32. Is that the same as what you're referring to? Number23 Dec 2015 #52
You'll note that the OP of this thread gave a hearty rec to the thread linking to the fascist site.. SidDithers Dec 2015 #63
The hosts need to lock right wing sources. joshcryer Dec 2015 #51
Right wing rhetoric should be blocked liberal N proud Dec 2015 #54
Is this a push-poll? Proserpina Dec 2015 #55
Why bother .... ronnykmarshall Dec 2015 #56
Does this include HA Goodman? Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #60
Other: If a RW source is corroborated by a non-rw source it can be acceptable. stevenleser Dec 2015 #61
Locking... BooScout Dec 2015 #66
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Should we consider rightw...»Reply #0