Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Should we consider rightwing sources and smears posted here to attack Democratic candidates [View all]
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by BooScout (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
a violation of community standards?
I think we should. How about you?
8 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Poll closed | |
Yes I will vote to hide such posts, no matter which Democratic candidate they attack. | |
6 (75%) |
|
Yes I will vote to hide such posts, but only if they attack my Democratic candidate. | |
0 (0%) |
|
No I will not vote to hide such posts. | |
2 (25%) |
|
This is disruptive meta, why don't the hosts do something! | |
0 (0%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
66 replies, 4140 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should we consider rightwing sources and smears posted here to attack Democratic candidates [View all]
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2015
OP
Too many people view posting videos of a candidate speaking as a smear & attack
peacebird
Dec 2015
#1
You linked to a racist right wing website and now you're defending it?
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#21
21 recs for a thread linking to a racist tea party website say otherwise.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#34
I thought posting from RW sources was a TOS violation, if used as a credible reference.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#7
One problem is that many sources are called rightwing if they happen to have a critical article
peacebird
Dec 2015
#17
A Jim Hoff website? Especially after it was pointed out as being from that site?
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#18
And yet 'many' is not me. I find that shite revolting, and progressivestoday is a Democrat bashing
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#46
Obvious is obvious. Community standards are what we - the community - decide they are.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2015
#25
I disagree. It's not disruptive meta to post a poll asking for opinions.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#31
We shouldn't link to hate sites - but if a clip is posted of a candidate saying something without
Juicy_Bellows
Dec 2015
#12
Didn't you link to Stormfront in an effort to smear a Jewish candidate?
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#22
No, you claimed they support Bernie and linked to them to "prove" your theory.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#37
Well we know we can count on you to post rightwing smears and to proudly defend doing so.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2015
#26
No, all sides are guilty of it but the one cited today by a HC supporter is especially vile.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#23
I asked skinner once in ata and he said as long as a jury keeps it, it is ok.
hrmjustin
Dec 2015
#29
You read those despicable smears and you're upset that I wasn't polite enough to the posters?
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#64
Well, I hope this means that the next time I alert on the poster who keeps linking to a fascist
Starry Messenger
Dec 2015
#47
You'll note that the OP of this thread gave a hearty rec to the thread linking to the fascist site..
SidDithers
Dec 2015
#63
Other: If a RW source is corroborated by a non-rw source it can be acceptable.
stevenleser
Dec 2015
#61