|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 02:58 PM Original message |
It's Not Maple Syrup Dean's Out Selling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well now nobody can say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. He is a fabulous speaker, attractive, serious, thoughtful and I could certainly get behind him for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mabus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. At last, someone remind the world what American democracy really is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. I am so digging watching Dean go international. The world knows a winner... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. One of the things that sank Dean (besides the Ohio yelp) was his wife's situation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. She's a physician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. As a doctor, her first obligation damn well SHOULD be her patients... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. If she's not in the kitchen baking cookies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I respectfully disagree. The First Lady is an important position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. You realize, I'm sure that there have been Presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. "Without a spouse" is different than having a spouse who does not feel she has to accompany her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. That is even more arrogant than the other post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. I just can't get you to understand. So I'm going to say... if you want to keep swearing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Sorry, Radio Lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. You may be right. Let's just see what happens in 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
72. Ain't nuthin' to clear up, sweetie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-04-06 01:16 AM Response to Reply #27 |
75. So you're against the idea of a woman keeping her own name when she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 08:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
65. Remember how the Clintons were criticized for treating it as a 2-person job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Of course, you may disagree, and that is your right. However, Dr. Judith Steinberg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. You are saying a lot of people can't run for president..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. You are totally misrepresenting my position. I like Howard Dean and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Look it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. No, I did not misrepresent anything at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. "The other unspoken factor is that she's Jewish" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Yes, radiolady said because his wife was Jewish.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Mad Floridian, I never said he couldn't be elected! Please re-read my posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Bullshit, you went after his wife. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. You can swear all you want. I'm stating what I believe are the facts and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ripple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:12 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. What does her being Jewish have to do with anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Angry?? He's not running and you still attacked his wife.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. Unbelievable? Are you Jewish? If you were, you wouldn't say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Are you suggesting that a Jewish spouse would NOT be a factor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Well, then let's talk about all the other candidates....one by one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. I have no intention of being drawn into this any further. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You started it. I did not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. I don't think it's a factor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. Cali, you may be right. Let's hope so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Hey Radio Lady...you forgot another bad thingy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
46. Thanks for the quote from his book. Given everything, do you think Howard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. In depends on who the party bosses still are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. "He is not running." Are you sure of that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Did you read it? It is about a power shift in the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:02 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Yes, I read it. The quote you posted said he was being judged by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:07 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. You did not read it apparently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. You really are out to "win friends and influence people," aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:39 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. I don't go around insulting people's wives or husbands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. What unfounded opinons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
59. I'm not getting into this argument, but I don't like unsubstantiated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Well, at least I am realistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted to break down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
48. I simply stated my homegrown reaction to a wife and mother who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:03 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Your "homegrown" reaction is what laws like the CRA were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Your sight is failing. I made my comments and stick to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. My sight is just fine. I get the feeling there is something else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Spooky3, you seem to want to be judge and jury on my opinions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
73. Head for the hills, the joooooooooooos are coming!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. You were appalled?? You were appalled?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 05:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Does that mean that single people need not apply? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
51. Well, let's look at it this way. What single man has ever held the presidency? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 08:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
66. Our only bachelor President to remain so: James Buchanan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:19 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Thanks, Mcscajun. Always can count on the DU audience to come up with facts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #51 |
67. Sure they had interests. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
71. Whadda buncha shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 10:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
74. I believe that you are talking about the perception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Deans Revenge, . . . snicker.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. "We have to stand up for what we believe in" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. it is BECAUSE of his success that the bloatway talking heads are spewing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
41. A little bit about Judy Steinberg Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
56. If a Republican wife had said this, do you think it would have hurt a Republican candidate's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. You need to win, so I will back off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-04-06 01:24 AM Response to Reply #56 |
76. So a bachelor or widower wouldn't be electable, even though a handful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
63. I am confused.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-03-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. Friday's Child, in post #3, brought up the possibility of Dean running in '08. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-04-06 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
77. This got zero coverage, but very interesting indeed. Another trip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-04-06 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
78. Far Too Many Democrats Don't Know A Pearl When They See It! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 30th 2024, 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC