|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:53 AM Original message |
Edwards wants a 3-person debate....without Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. no fear, if that's what you imply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's not obvious to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. the HRC/Edwards chat most offended Dennis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. He chose "these three" because it's most advantageous to Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Speaking of "blatant manipulation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Hilliam? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Deleted message |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Is that a personal attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Sounds about right to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 05:45 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. That is crap and your thread is misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Absolutely, Inspired, you are correct. Edwards fears no one in a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JANdad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Better be careful what you wish for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Edwards debated Cheney, he can successfully debate anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:55 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Cheney was not the strongest person Edwards debated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
28. pick - pick - pick - pick. ---pick!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
5. I thought the suggestion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
9. you could have a better format and still keep all the candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:19 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Let's hope they do. Edwards was offering up a suggested way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
14. This is the debate I'd like to see: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Who is Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
25. More of a person than HRC, Obama or Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Who also seem to be the Next President of the United States. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. Doubtful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. Who is William769? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
15. Um, because he'll face him later? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
19. That's part of the "smaller groups" strategy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 09:12 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Good Lord, get a grip on reality why don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Answer this simple question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leez34 (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 09:24 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 09:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Again...why didn't Edwards include Obama in the conversation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. You must be joking, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
26. This is an untrue post. Edwards said he would do it as long as no one was excluded. Go back and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. That's Edwards' spin on it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. NO!!! That is what he said about the "Clinton-Edwards-Kucinich" stupid debate thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Whatever you may call it, the op is false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Not really...and YOUR assertion that Edwards really wants separate groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. HAHAHAHA. The op is false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. HAHAHAHAHA! No it's not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. He only wants smaller groupS because he was caught |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. hell, i even want a smaller group! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Again-he didn't SAY he wanted smaller groupS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Why do you think jenmito hates Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:32 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Thanks, Clark2008, but I guess it's because s/he can't answer my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. some people are so hate-filled they can't see straight. what a turnoff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
draft_mario_cuomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
45. calteachguy promotes a lie about a Democrat yet again and uses the right-wing term "Billary" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I've alerted on this shithead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 26th 2024, 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC