|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 09:48 AM Original message |
John Edwards: I'm pulling THEIR coverage in 2009! (Congress, President, etc.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. As if they could not pay for private insurance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. That is the point. They could pay for health insurance, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. SO what ! How does Edwards propose to pass this if he does not have the vote to pass the full bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. He will make it politically uncomfortable for Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. You forget about those "pre-existing conditions." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Uhm! Let see! How long would it take for an insurance company to waive that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yeah, a private insurer is going to agree to pay out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. How would he have such a bill passed, anyway! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Why I support John Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Geez, no call for that insinuation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I didn't realize you were asking a question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well, that's different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. If he can't get his health care plan passed, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Edwards is responding to what voters are saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I didn't say anything about what the voters want, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. No shortage of people who like being pandered to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Because the Congress won't dare vote health care for itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. He won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's a nice applause line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
5. Well now................ Edwards playing hard ball. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
8. Seems kind of gimmicky to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Agreed, Sparkly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
11. I'm considering changing my avatar now! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Woooo!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
14. With the WH and Congress in the 20% approval vicinity, setting oneself up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IA_Seth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
19. More grandstanding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
25. Wicked awesome!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
26. k n r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
29. Is this a new form of a unitary President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. He can't do it? Think again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. It looks like it's unconsitutional: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-17-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
32. I thought the populist idea was to cover everyone...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC