|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 01:47 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should government issued marriage licenses be replaced with civil union licenses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. The two are split in France. That is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. The same is true in some Latin American countries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Here it's the other way round. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. The state has no business "licensing" who adults can fall in love with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. many people fail to realize that the mariage contract has three parties--the two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. no. you're forgetting that some non-religious people also want to marry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. UU, Humanist, Buddhist or other ceremony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. You may have a non-religious marriage ceremony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 08:24 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. I was disagreeing with the OP's claim that only churches would "marry". I don't like the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. we should redefine it so that a certain group will never have access. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phen43 (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. I like it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. Yes! Absolutely! Which is exactly why I say I oppose "gay marriage" Laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Okay, that covers taxes. How about other benefits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Well, yes, wording s/b changed to "civil union" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes. It's really the way it should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamahaingttta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why should it be limited to couples? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seasat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
15. I've always felt that the government support of marriage was for population expansion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. The two ideas should be disentangled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-28-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
21. husband/wife husband/husband wife/wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-30-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
22. Yes, excellent idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC