|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:42 PM Original message |
John Edwards BEATS all Repubs, Hillary LOSES to all Repubs. We must UNITE & take our message OFFLINE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. LOL!! Based on a snapshot? Without taking other critical factors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Huh? Kerry won because of the electability issue? What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. would Dean have done better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Agreed. I'm convinced Edwards is the only one who will do what I want done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. That is a good reason to vote for someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Then that's an excellent reason to vote for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. It's a snapshot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. You say snapshot, I say poll with good track record. You say matching funds bad, I say good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
44. Obama hasn't taken any lobbyist money either for his presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #44 |
137. Obama's registered lobbyist bundlers - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
82. Rasmussen Didn't Get NH Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Fortunately with Edwards we get POLICY/PROGRAMS *AND* ELECTABILITY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. listen, bucko |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. "bucko"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. let's see: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Hurled insults? He said you were being disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
64. first of all bucko is not name calling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. *sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #64 |
78. No, not nevermind. You just called Joe Fields a LIAR, and not obliquely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #64 |
91. I Feel Ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. I'm glad you and cali think that disagreement is best met with insults and nastiness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. I Respect Honest Disagreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElboRuum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #64 |
115. Besides... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #37 |
86. Oh, don't forget... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. I thought I couldn't get more disgusted with this place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
95. "bucko"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Did she sneeringly call you "pumpkin" too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #95 |
107. You Cherry Picked Polls And Old Polls At That To Bolster Your Claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #34 |
131. Cali, Cali, Cali... Give it up. "Snapshot"? That's the funniest one you've come up with yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
94. No, it's not but it sure does help if they're electable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
141. I believe the point is... Kerry won the nomination because of ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Edwards is both more ELECTABLE and also has the better PROGRAMS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
74. False. Obama hasn't taken any lobbyist money for his presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Are you trying to tell us that you wouldn't be posting this in ALL CAPS if it favored your guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
40. Thanks for your concern and your gratuitous attack over formatting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
55. Um, I actually wasn't talking to you. But feel free to get pissed off anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
99. True, now I see your reply was to post #1 (from cali), not the OP (from me) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
76. I rarely post in all caps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #76 |
109. Avoiding the real issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. what are you babbling about now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. I thought my meaning was pretty self-explanatory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. What exactly is wrong with accepting matching funds? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Nothing, really. It's just the only issue she has left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Not just cali... other anti-Edwards members have echoed that point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. You don't see anything problematic with Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. What about after the convention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Because the convention is in late August. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. And the only way he can defend himself is with ads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Um, unless he plans on hijacking CNN with a pirate satellite, pretty much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. See post 53... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. He could have all the money in the world and he'd still have to hijack MSM ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Yes, you can pay to hijack the MSM for coverage. They're called 'advertisements.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. Like I said, it's called a grassroots revolution. Relying on MSM for anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #77 |
118. "Grassroots revolutions" are declared daily. Not impressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #118 |
122. Dude, I'm sure as hell not trying to impress you or anyone else...lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
84. 2004: bushco, $255 million. Kerry, $220 million. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
83. Here's what's wrong with it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
127. Kerry didn't win because he was the most electable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 09:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
130. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
135. What we got was the winning candidate. Kerry won in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
138. Edwards the only Dem who has polled consistently beating all Republican candidates for 6 months!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. What a load of BS! See my signature! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Putting statements in your signature doesn't actually make them true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. A snapshot poll from god knows when is not any more reliable than my own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. So your scientific critique of the polling methods used would be...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. They represent - at the very best a moment in time - that will not be relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. And tell me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. So we shouldn't vote for him because he doesn't have enough money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. He took matching funds. He'll be walking into the General Election Gunfight armed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
136. Edwards hasn't been the subject of attacks from left or right yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. Gen'l election polls don't mean anything right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Absolutely. It's like Dean and Gephardt's 2004 Iowa murder-suicide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DontTreadOnMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. Will Hillary voters feel like the Nader voters did after the 2000 election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #25 |
133. Yes, and running Hillary will bring out a bigger Repug turnout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
28. Cherry-picking polls & telling lies doesn't help your cause. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Telling lies? What lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. It Does With The Willfully Ignorant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Why the nastiness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. Because The OP Is Slandering Hillary Clinton With False Accusations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Oh all right that makes it A-OK then... if they think differently from you, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
70. Ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. You insinuated that anyone who didn't agree with you is "willully ignorant" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. She Could Have Said Edwards Performs Best Against Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. No one called Hillary a LOSER. Defensive much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. "Hillary LOSES to all Repubs" -From The Seminal Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. Yes.. Hillary LOSES to all Repubs"... not quite the same thing as calling Hillary a LOSER is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
90. your indignation would be far more convincing if you ever chided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. You just don't pay enough attention, cali. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #92 |
101. He Or She Made A Tendentious And Fallacious Argument And I Called Bullshit On It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. You called them "Willfully Ignorant". Not quite the same. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. What's Wrong With That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #90 |
106. I quoted my poll and I suggested a grassroots DU strategy to combat the media blackout on Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
31. I hear about RASMUSSEN polls every day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. And these numbers ring true because all the other "critical factors" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
35. SO MANY LIES ...SO LITTLE TIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. How sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. I Don't See Any Undecideds In The Rasmussen Poll The Seminal Poster Based Her Entire Argument On |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Excuse Me Three Percent Undecided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. You can go on conversing with yourself if you like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. The Appropriate Thing To Do When You Are Wrong Is Just Admit It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. What am I "wrong" about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
47. A month ago I got a robo-call from McCain saying he was the best Repub to beat Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #47 |
63. The specter of a Hillary presidency is indeed what conservatives fear/hate the most. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
48. Uh Oh! Someone at Firedog Lake just pissed on your parade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. I Hope You Hang Around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #59 |
142. hillary SHOULDN'T WIN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
53. PolitiFact addresses the matching funds attack on Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Also: John McCain is taking matching funds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. Assuming our 527s can be as vicious as theirs can, it would even the playing field. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #60 |
79. I'm Not Sure McCain Will Be The Nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #60 |
98. McCain has not taken matching funds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #98 |
105. Neither has Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. that is very good news. I hope he backs out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #112 |
117. I think he'll end up without a choice in the matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #62 |
100. you know, you're projecting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
71. This relies heavily on "independent groups," which are forbidden from either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #53 |
93. The DNC is behind the RNC in fundraising and they have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
120. There you go, injecting facts into a perfectly good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 07:01 AM Response to Reply #53 |
129. Yep. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
61. Gee, all other polling shows hrc and obama beating any rethug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #61 |
73. It Was Rasmuseen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
81. All caps and bold - now that is persuasion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StefanX (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #81 |
108. I use all caps and bold judiciously to for emphasis, particularly in headlines where there's no BOLD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #108 |
113. nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
87. Kind of a chickenshit argument. And we call the Democrats in Congress cowards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #87 |
110. Chickenshit? You make no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
111. John Edwards has to be supported!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
119. These are POLLS! GEEZ, when are you guys going to realize that this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
121. kick! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
123. How often are we so fortunate that the candidate with the most BACKBONE is also the MOST ELECTABLE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #123 |
134. Bingo. And I feel that creative minds can raise more money between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
124. That's why Edwards won't get the nomination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stravu9 (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
125. YES, AND WE ALL KNOW IT'S TRUE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-15-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
126. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
128. It is EDWARDS job to get this message out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
132. For some reason the Dems seem to shoot themselves in the GE. Hope it will be different in 08. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
139. Not true. The poll shows Hillary beating Ron Paul. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-16-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
140. Chaos Theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Jun 13th 2024, 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC