|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 04:54 AM Original message |
Millions of dems will be angry and disappointed today, and I've come to the conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. What makes you think that the Clinton campaign wouldn't have appealed a 50% reduction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I don't know that, but I still think taking all the delegates away was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamalone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I do agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. The DNC probably felt like it wouldn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamalone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:40 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. You're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kennetha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:41 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Well, true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZSlacker (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Speaking of alternative possible outcomes, imagine if your candidate hadn't assumed that she'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
31. Even if they did, it would at least have been a valid election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
35. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
curious one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. DNC should not be blamed. FL and MI did know and were ready for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. It was simply too draconian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. are you 'ready for the consequences?' i.e. losing FL and MI in the GE? you've heard of the GE, haven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. The FL and MI problem will be solved today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kennetha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Why should a guy who wasn't on the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Who the fuck do you think those voters were voting for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:22 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. You mean, a guy who was following the rules? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kennetha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
7. This was a blunder of huge proportions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Why do you just make stuff up? It's reprehensible. Truly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kennetha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:39 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. He (or his surrogates) have talked about a 50/50 split |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:49 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. No, they have not ever endorsed a 50-50 split. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kennetha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:57 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. You're wrong. They have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:59 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shaniqua6392 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Obama has a fair chance of winning here in Michigan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. That is NOT Obama's position regardless of how Hillary tries to frame it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:25 AM Response to Original message |
8. Do you honestly think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. Millions of Dems are angry and disappointed every primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hola (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
20. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
24. Well, the DNC didn't think the process would look like this 2 yrs ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
25. The CLINTON camp, NOT the DNC is to blame for all of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:30 AM Response to Reply #25 |
38. Someone on CNN made an excellent point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
28. It was a strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
29. I don't think the DNC intended to permanently strip MI and FL of all their delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
30. Well the blame then would be with the Clinton camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frickaline (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
32. I think the big problem is the fact that the GOP can mess with these dates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
33. I have loved Dean since I first discovered him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
34. Should of, Would of, Could of, makes no difference now. Easy to be a arm chair critic. They did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
36. Word on CNN is that that may be the solution to Florida. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
37. Perhaps... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 08:33 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Why is that good? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-31-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. This has nothing to do with a candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 30th 2024, 06:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC