|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:43 PM Original message |
Update: Vote To Get Sgt. At Arms To Force Missing Senators To Chamber - 44-46 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oy! They have to vote on that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. how many votes are needed to force this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Majority Of Those Present I Believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Great way to get rethugs there to vote "nay"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH AAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. IN WHOSE FAVOR???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:46 PM Original message |
Our Favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Ours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. i can't beLieve aLL the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Rethugs protecting their own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. They're voting no because it's sooooooo late, they're tired, they have mistresses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. aren't they up to a quorum now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Sure. The plan is working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. is there a second vote going on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. Brownback votes with the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. thune no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. I heard that too and nearly fainted. Now it makes sense and all is once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. Hagel Votes NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nice to know this is of such importance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. coleman NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. snowe NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akoto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. So, they can just vote and people get off the hook? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
21. Reid calls for this when he doesn't ave the votes? WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I believe he's trying to get the Republicans to the floor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. Byrd Voted No??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Burr perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crappyjazz (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
24. Which is 83, I thought a quorum was 51? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. This is the vote to send the Sargent to collect the Senators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crappyjazz (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
27. Lieberman - no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Purveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
28. Lieberman - NO (of course) n/et |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTG of the PRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:57 PM Original message |
Allard votes no. Big surprise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. I Hope This Becomes A Regular Occurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Please enlighten me--exactly what is the point of all this? Does it hurt or help us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. sort like watching paint dry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I'm Looking Forward To Midnight Here On West Coast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. It Forces The Quorum To Be Present |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC