|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:36 AM Original message |
Breaking: Miers, Bush Chief of Staff to face contempt charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. She doesn't fear contempt charges because her boyfriend (gw) will rescue her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
That Is Quite Enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. Take her down, Conyers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
5. They have to wait two days to charge her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I suspect just to be nice and let them have time to think it over and maybe reconsider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. In two days, she can make it down to Paraguay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. I'm looking at the Judiciary committee site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. just get the Sargent at arms to arrest them please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
8. Contempt Of Congress? Ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. It's over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Perhaps. And perhaps this is a deliberate trap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
10. Well, it's about f'n TIME!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. If it's not inherent contempt, it's just gonna go down the memory hole. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
12. Good! Then the DOJ will refuse to act. Then? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozymandius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Then they will pursue Inherent Contempt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Once the DOJ refuses to act... it's obstruction & conspiracy time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. CHIMPEACHMENT BABY!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. And what happened to the Condi subpoena? All gone? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. me wonder about that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
16. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
20. Ooooh delicious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC