|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 08:50 PM Original message |
Robert Luskin Rove's attorney cites Executive Privilege will not appear before Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. Does anyone know if "Executive Privilege" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. FIrst of all it doesn't involve national security, Clinton V Jones was allowed to proceed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Like the democrats pursued the administation all the other times? I'm not holding my breath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnyxCollie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. They used executive privilege as an excuse to keep Harriet Miers from being questioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Rove will be protected by Executive Privilege according to Bush, but who is it to blame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. I believe I read here once, that she was related to a Skull & Boner, does anyone know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Sorry they all ready ruled against Bill Clinton on that one, and that was when he was in office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. Rove Must Be Peeing In His Pants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. It didn't work for Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Krashkopf (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. Two Words, Karl . . . INHERENT CONTEMPT!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmosh42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 04:00 AM Response to Original message |
9. Time to put up or shut up, Conyers! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 05:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. The dems are a joke. And the criminals continue to laugh in their faces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 07:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Anyone heard from Pelosi? How about Steny Hoyer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Pelosi just got back from war mongering in the Mideast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
12. still can't find a link, just the Abrams video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 08:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Karl Rove Claims Executive Privilege: Refuses To Testify About Siegelman Prosecution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
15. Arrest him for contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pberq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
18. Kick & Nominated - How long will this go on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 30th 2024, 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC