|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:25 AM Original message |
Is Jane Hamsher's irrational hatred of the President and his supporters racially motivated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. LOL - this sounds like a FOX news question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Sadly you could have tried to insult me even worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
50. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hand_With_Eyes
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
72. Hense the problem with many hardcore Obama supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themaguffin
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
73. yeah it does. regardless of her comments this thread is irrational and need not be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. she's usually rational |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. She wrote here comments in a blog and had more than enough time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
51. Hear, hear!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 02:30 AM Response to Reply #3 |
60. I suppose Hamsher is "rational" in that she's doing what personally profits her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. Deleted message |
pmorlan1
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. Silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I guess you will look past the horrible messenger because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cherchez la Femme
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
85. You're actually accusing a DU'er of being racist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
9. Yes! Next question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
10. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
11. Nobody but a racist would ever post a picture like the one in the link, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Never underestimate the powers of racism and hatred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Explain it to me. What does that picture mean? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 06:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
55. I couldn't figure it out either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 09:35 AM Response to Reply #55 |
70. Here's what I think she was saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
13. She has issues, IMO. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
39. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
14. she's a mini-sarah palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. I think she's much more on par with Orly Taitz. Some real race/anger issues... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PragmaticLiberal
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
15. I don't know alot about Hamsher.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #15 |
30. She was indeed. Like many of Hillary's disappointed supporters eg..Geraldine Ferraro, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
16. Deleted message |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Attacking my opinion as "over the top hatred" is support for the Jane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Well I'm not going to argue that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:05 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Big fish or small fish- they all make for good eating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. True. We all have our flash points. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
18. I don't see any other explanation as to why she was for Hillary (who was more conservative than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:05 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Yup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilyeye
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 04:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
63. I agree with this. As far left as she is, I don't see how she is for Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
25. At one point a Firedog Lake blogger did talk about education Black folks about Obama. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Not surprising, not surprising at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wait Wut
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
52. I think I remember that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 12:35 AM Response to Reply #25 |
59. I remember that well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 07:41 AM Response to Reply #25 |
67. Link please? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
27. A couple questions: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Lieberman's shameless race baiting flyer (and a few words) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. The article you provided a link to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. People can reads the links if they want and form their own opinion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Deleted message |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Don't get me wrong - I didn't call you a RW asshat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 01:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Satire is suppose to offend by clever ridicule not the use of racist imagery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creon
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
33. I have no need to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Con men usually make sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creon
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. On the surface |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
35. Probably not. But she is a freakin' ultra radical and her comments are nutty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
57. To the contrary, unnamed sources suggest she has ties to the Klan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
37. Not so closet. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
41. Hamsher is a racist, period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. de Rothschild - a prime example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Maybe it's not race but gender. Perhaps she supported Hillary because she is a woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I am pretty sure being a sexist is as bad as being a racists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Then she should quit claiming to champion a political movement if it's only about gender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 12:16 AM Response to Reply #47 |
58. I am not defending her in general. I am just saying that we don't have enough to go on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 05:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. Divide and conquer .... a black man versus a white woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
46. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stoic
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
49. Haha, Not surprised you went there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 08:35 AM Response to Reply #49 |
68. The transparency of their true motivation (a hatred of Liberals), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rury
![]() |
Fri Jul-15-11 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
53. It probably is.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgrrrll
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
61. Who knows. I think she is an attention seeker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoDesuKa
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
62. You're Onto Something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidpdx
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
64. She is a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 07:23 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. LOL....far from it. I suspect were she a Republican she would be liked much more here in GD:P. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
65. What a truly ridiculous statement. She is a Liberal who disagrees with Conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Sat Jul-16-11 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
69. She is a PUMA looking to make money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 04:51 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Wish I could rec your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young but wise
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #69 |
93. The end. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
74. Discredit the messenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Can you quantify "a lot of people"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
75. Deleted message |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
76. Loaded question that starts with the assumptions she hates Obama and his supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-17-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
78. Deleted message |
krabigirl
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
79. lmao |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
80. Ahhhh, here we go again............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PragmaticLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. So if Senator Obama was more experienced, you would have been on board with his candidacy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. I would have still have preferred Hillary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor Hurt
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #80 |
86. I love when privileged types dismiss claims of racism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. What precisely are "privileged types"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. You mean like these lovely ladies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Gerry Ferraro was a fighter for civil rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 09:42 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. She was a lot more than that, and I agree, I hope she found peace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Mon Jul-18-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
84. Some of it is, unconscious, and unintentional. Some of it is deliberate and blatantly obvious! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
91. Possibly. I don't know. Is people's hatred of Hamsher motivated by her gender? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. Forky, how are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. I'm done with all of that, and doing well in that department at least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Oh boy, I hope that it's nothing major!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Nothing wrong with trying to get medical payments reimbursed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. OK, good vibes and thanks for the advice!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. Not here. I have a problem with anyone trying to divide and conquer Dems. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
92. You're really building a portfolio here aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. This one's a peach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Tue Jul-19-11 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
97. so says the resident liberal hater. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 10th 2024, 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC