Democratic Underground - I'm quickly becoming a purist on the Fourth

Reply #92: I'm quickly becoming a purist on the Fourth [View All]

Occulus

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Dec-24-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #25

92. I'm quickly becoming a purist on the Fourth

and my opinion is that ANY search, lacking a warrant, is unconstitutional.

THE DAMN DOCUMENT SAYS SO IN PLAIN FUCKING ENGLISH!!!

"No warrants shall be issued" means NO WARRANTS, PERIOD, without specification. I'm getting fucking tired of the exceptions. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS. None. Period. Zip. Zilch. Any exceptions REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT.

We need to disallow trunk searches and the like. NO WARRANTS SHALL BE ISSUED means NO WARRANTS SHALL BE ISSUED. SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED means SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED.

Trunk searches, plain sight, and ALL THE REST should be DUMPED as unconstitutional. And NO, I do NOT care what that does to the ability of law enforcement to "do their jobs".

If they have to violate the Constitution, they are not doing their jobs, and I see ALL OF THE ABOVE as a violation of my Fourth Amendment rights, SCOTUS ruling be fucking bloody chunky DAMNED!

I'm tired of this country. I long to be truly free.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Reply #92: I'm quickly becoming a purist on the Fourth [View All]