You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: This article bothered me when I first read it, and [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. This article bothered me when I first read it, and
I couldn't figure out why. Flu, exhaustion ...

It just wapped me upside the head.

When we were all obsessing over burqas and Afghanistan a few years back, the burqa was a prominent part of the ranting. But, Islamic apologists responded, it's not part of Islam: Many tribes/clans/cultures have intermixed their own cultural norms with Islam, to the detriment of the virtual perfection that is Islam. The burqa, backwards tho' it be, is one such custom: Islam is moderate and tolerant in all things, and requires simply modesty and light covering, not the oppressive and completely un-Islamic burqa. The burqa does not represent Islam.

Fast forward to the present: To ban the burqa is to insult Islam.

Either the former apologists lied to us, or they're clueless about Islam. Or the current crop are lying to us, or are clueless about Islam.

"Whack-a-mole" comes to mind. Islam is whatever a Muslim says it is; if there's a problem, just find a Muslim who can state, dogmatically, that the horrible thing done by a "Muslim" under discussion isn't Islam--if that's what's needed; if, instead, it's necessary to say how horrible some "Muslim" is being treated, find a Muslim who'll say the opposite. 1 billion Muslims; no shortage of apodictic statements about Islam. The former apologists were either deluded as to their own importance, simply forgot that their opinions are less useful than they let on, or lied. (So, are current apologists in the same boat?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC