You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: Why a 'fundamental huuman right'? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Why a 'fundamental huuman right'?
Do you think any kid is better off having a secret abortion, dealing with none of the factors that lead to the pregnancy in the first place, and going back home with a really, really, really big burden for a kid that age and no one to talk to? Let's say the girl wound up pregnant because of incest? Sure, she gets the abortion, but does anything happen to her abuser? He's free to act again and she'll be back for another abortion sooner or later.

Yes, I think they will be better off with the abortion, if that's their choice. If it's incest, getting the abortion wouldn't prevent prosecuting the abuser, if it was the father or stepfather - who would already know the girl could potentially be pregnant in that case. If it were another family member, then the consideration is the same for any rape victim - you shouldn't force the victim to go through a court case if they think it will be too traumatic for them. By forcing them to go to their parents before an abortion is possible, you would put a few at physical risk - there are some parents would would get physical as soon as they knew of the pregnancy.

You really think it's better to ignore the judgement of the girl? If they can decide on an abortion for themselves, they have the chance of getting the relationship back on track, or at least keeping it in its current dubious, but non-violent (and providing a home) state. There may be a few cases where the judgement of the girl, even after advice from school and medical professionals, plus anyone else they feel they can trust, is worse than that of the non-trusted parent - but I think those will be far outwieghed by the numbers of girls who correctly think their parents won't do the right thing for them, but instead have their own idea of 'decency' screw things up. Why do you think the emotional problems of leaving home will always be better than ending the pregnancy without the parents knowing?

I still can't see why you think it's a 'fundamental human right', and you don't seem to have argued anything about that - just that you see some situations where it's better for the child if the parents know. The parent has a responsibility to care for their children. That doesn't mean the same as a right to know everything about the child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC