You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #72: Well I guess it depends on how you interpret it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
72. Well I guess it depends on how you interpret it.
"Reid said Sunday he would support a temporary increase of U.S. troops in Iraq". Seems to me that is yes to escalation and yes to out by 2008.

As for the ISG, if they did indeed put in support for escalation, as they seem to have done, I am against that too. There is much in the ISG report that appears to be 'stay in Iraq until 1-20-09 and then blame a Democrat'. The war is wrong. Our presence there makes our crimes worse and prevents any resolution. We cannot win. Escalation will not work but it will increase the number of dead Iraqis murdered by our criminal invasion of their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC