Reply #49: Perhaps because evidence suggests that it is caused a physical "defect".. [View All]

...which can only develop whilst the child is still in the womb.


One thing you people seem to overlook is that vaccines ARE NOT WHERE BIG PHARMA MAKES ITS MONEY. Vaccines are extremely low margin products. Very little research is done on developing new vaccines.

Thomersal was not used in vaccines because Big Pharma insisted that it be there. Big Pharma couldn't care less. They could save money simply by leaving it out, and even make more by marketing their product as mercury free.

It's presence did/does not benefit them. The beneficiaries are the humanitarian organisations which distribute the vaccines and the recipients who receive a guaranteed (as much as is possible) a viable dose.

So unless you want to posit a conspiracy which encompasses virtually every researcher in the world of imunotherapy, aid organisations, governments, and fuck knows who else, (oh and successfully inducts all graduate students) perhaps it might be easier to accept another far simpler premise: (or two)

Shit happens. (And I gotta blame someone, else I be forced to ask myself what I could have done differently. (Answer BTW: probably not a bloody thing that would have affected the outcome.)