Reply #33: Oh,Will, that is so touchingly naive. [View All]

Awwwwwwww...

You think Empress Hillary and massive Dem majorities (if that will even be permitted) will make any substantial moves to restore the Constitution and the Rule of Law?

I have my severe doubts, especially now that Nancy P. has confirmed what they think of the Filthy Little Nobodies they rule...that we are lowlife scum who deserve arrest for vagrancy for bothering Their Magnificences. I am guesing Hillary feels the same way too, but is waaaaay to savvy to mention it in public.

I recognize that is speculation, but it is based on seven years of deep observations, during which time my prognotications have shown to be at least 80% of the time correct.

In 2001 I said the deficit when Bushler left would be $10,000,000,000. Now it's quite clear that prophesy was wholly true. (we still had a surplus when I first said this...look it up)

In 2002 I predicted that after the invasion, torture would return to Iraq. I will admit I got one detail wrong, but it was from being too cautious in what I knew was coming (in truth, I was still blinded by my own prejudice of being former military) but I never guessed that torture would become established policy and shamelessly, openly performed by AMERICAN SOLDIERS. I guessed it would be Iraqis torturing each other under our direction, but again, I don't consider that "getting it wrong" when I actually got everything right but didn't go far enough in how evil I thought America and Americans could be under the mesemrizing rule of a Hitler, a Stalin, or a Bush.

There are so many more, and most of them predicted months and YEARS before they actually happened.

(these predictions and more, including the 20% I've gotten wrong, are achived on DU if you disbelieve me)

My point is: Empress Hillary might fix the ecomony a little and she will likely fix some environmental stuff (but not too much, can't offend her BIG contributors, CAN offend those Filthy Little Nobodies who deserve to be arrested for vagrancy), but I would place a lot of money on the fact that she will do nothing of significance to slow or stop Bushevism's Long March. At best, she will hold their place for them, and when Jeb or George P. Bush or whoever ascends the throne, they will start right back up, having preserved most or all of their gains in Crushing the American Experiment in Self-Governance.

My point also is: I see you have returned to making pathetic excuses for people who think you should be picked up and thrown in jail for vagrancy (although, as a journalist, you might seem a little bit like an actual human being to them, insetad of some vile bum who should be swept off the streets).

I'll say it again: Ignoring multiple serial felonies, high crimes and treason to game for electoral victory in 2008 is this height of absurdity. It is the height, the absolute hieght, of failing in one's duty to country, and selfish in the extreme (not you, the Democratic Leadership).

I'll say it again: Can you say that you believe the Republics would serially surrender if they were in the identical position as the Democrats, even if there were NO actual crime to prosecute?

Oh yeah that's right. We have our answer to that one. The Clinton Impeachment.