14. That does not mean that he should label something like those criticisms swiftboating.
They aren't. HRC is being attacked for what she said. This is valid political criticism.
Where are the lies? Where are the smear? I resent that Bill Clinton is using the fact that a large percent of people realize that what was done to Kerry and Clealand was wrong. That perception NEEDS to stay that way. Calling any criticism of HRC swiftboating dilutes that. (In fact, no one calls OTHER attacks on JK swiftboating - even when they were not true.) Here there is NOT EVEN A LIE.
I wish that Bill Clinton and his people had showed as much outrage in 2004 with the real swiftboaters. The election was close - and Kerry in 2005 would have been better than HRC in 2009.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
