You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: They were getting things wrong back in 2006, too. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. They were getting things wrong back in 2006, too.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 10:00 AM by Hissyspit
Actually what I'm doing is questioning the whole concept of a #1, the same way I will question the concept of al Qaeda in Iraq.

If you have gone through the past eight years and have no healthy skeptism of the swill that comes from the spokespeople for the Pentagon and the Bush administration and from the mainstream corporate media, then you have not been paying attention.

By the way, bye-bye.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC