Reply #23: dear God [View All]

<<But jailing people because of who/what they fantasize about, or over pictures that they look at, simply based on an ASSUMPTION that they WILL act on these fantasies?>>

So you don't think that a person who sent out all those photos of kids , some as young as four to 17 years old, and even described inappropriate sexual activity with his *own* children, has a history of sexual misconduct with underage girls, and up to now said it was just research, you don't think that's bad?

My understanding of pedophiles psychologically is that they cannot be cured. Also it's practically a given that just having the images won't satisfy them. They want to experience it. That's common sense, that's the behavior pattern. If they fantasize over a child of ANY age, that is sick. Pictures are just the beginning of it.

So please, I don't want to hear it. There is no excuse. None. If he was abused, then the abuse should have stopped THERE. He's supposed to be a man of God. He just makes me sick. It never is nor should it ever be, excusable.