You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: Then why is Obama resorting in the "stealth" nomination. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. Then why is Obama resorting in the "stealth" nomination.

Of course I don't know how she'll "turn out." But conservatives know something about her we do don't know yet. Otherwise, how do you explain the lack of caution, and even early enthusiasm on their part?

Ford was a "liberal" by today's standards but not by the standards of his day. The same goes for Stevens, he's a conservative-moderate, a liberal according to Limbaugh and Beck. Souter was chosen in the wake of Bork's rejection, and he was a "stealth" nomination.

My question is, why the stealth nominee? Who is being stealthed here? I think it's us this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC