You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: Which I think was the point of the OP. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Which I think was the point of the OP.
Graham and his ilk are, indeed, trying to have it both ways. Either the "no fly" list is an effective and constitutional law-enforcement tool, or it isn't. I would argue that it certainly seems to be neither effective nor constitutional, but if you argue that it's necessary to national security and therefore the constitutional issue should be overlooked, then it should also be overlooked in the matter of purchasing guns. At least Bloomberg's argument is logical, agree with it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC