50. You don't seem to get it. Let's suppose the document(s)
Fine is suppose to produce contains not only information that the court requires but also information having nothing to do with the case at hand that the court could use to either harm Fine and/or enrich itself at Fine's or the taxpayer's expense. In an ethical court this extraneous info would be set aside, deemed irrelevant. But not LA Country Superior Crooks. This court has been referred to in quasi legal publications as "the most crooked in the US". Should Fine produce and destroy himself concurrently? I think not. But, then, I know you don't know any of what I said is valid or not.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
