You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: I thought schools were already a safe space. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
chimpy the poopthrower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. I thought schools were already a safe space.
The violence we've been discussing takes place outside of school, doesn't it? Schools already are (or were) a safe space.

Do you think those Muslim girls who would like to wear a headscarf but are now forced to expose themselves in school will continue to consider schools a "safe space"? Do you think that those Muslim girls whose parents now decide to keep them home instead of sending them to school will be grateful to the French government for "protecting their freedom"? Do you think that the Muslim community will now be more likely to assimilate into the dominant French culture rather than feel victimized by this law that was clearly aimed at them (as is widely acknowledged in France)?

Schools are not exactly social service agencies, although they do have a role to play. For example, in the U.S., if a child comes to school covered with bruises, or has many unexplained absences, the school has a responsibility to notify authorities so that the situation can be investigated. I imagine France has a similar system. That is certainly much different from going into people's homes and simply looking for offenses, which is not something I would ever advocate in any country.

I must also disagree with your assertion that "Other religions in France have made accommodations to secular culture in the public schools. Islam will be no exception, especially where devoting half your head to a religious garment is concerned." This ban certainly does not affect all religions equally. No Christian sect that I know of requires its followers to wear crosses. Yet, a 17-year-old French Christian girl can still wear a small cross to school, even though it serves no other purpose than to publicly proclaim her religion. But a 17-year-old French Muslim girl can no longer wear a scarf over her hair even though she considers it a religious and cultural obligation, and is not intended as a public proclamation of her religion but as an expression of modesty. How would you feel to be forced to expose a part of your body you had always considered private?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC