You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #67: Through 200 years of tradition and actually doing it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News

hack89

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Jul-10-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #65

67. Through 200 years of tradition and actually doing it.

Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 03:57 PM by hack89

Though there are justices like Scalia who would agree with you. I personally tend towards agreeing with justices like Ginsberg.

Look - this is not an argument you can win. Like it or not, in America the Supreme Court assumed the role of interpreting the Constitution a long time ago and it is not going to change. Besides, do you really think the Constitution is such a black and white document that it does not require interpretation? If so, show me the language that justifies Rove V. Wade as an example.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.