You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: ? - Can "cutting age techies" be older than 45 but younger than 59-1/2? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. ? - Can "cutting age techies" be older than 45 but younger than 59-1/2?
and are there "image" criteria? Too bald, too fat, too smokey, credit too bad after trying to find ANY employment in the last X years, too many previous employers notwithstanding mergers, downsizings, short-term private and government consulting contracts that were abruptly cancelled due to golf-game team shake-ups, take too many pills for problems associated w/aging like menopause, depression, anxiety, personal transportation emits too much pollution, household uses too many Internet hours and visits the WRONG sites, no brands on any piece of visible clothing, just any old subjective, arbitrary reasons?

What's up with the age discrimination? I seem to recall that those OVER age 40 were protected by some code as it relates to federal (military?)workers and applicable to those corporations that engage in federal contracts...no? What about those IT-types that are too old, but not old enough, TOUGH LUCK; these folks can hope they don't make it to a ripe, OLD age or need Aricept!

Either way it's insulting, demeaning, and seems euphemistic for SLAVERY - On second thought, perhaps re-training for Walmart or burger flipping would be preferable - is that the strategy? Perhaps some could hold out that way until "retirement." Ah yes, time flies when one is having FUN, boomer-style!

The military has been chopping out its "dead wood" civilian force by attrition/forced early retirement for years. They even tried to black mail someone I know by offering to pay the freight for a Ph.D.--never did find out if the offer was accepted.

Any way, many already have a DD Form 214 and learned how to shoot at the enemy! One can only hope that short-term memory goes first...so we won't remember why we needed to remember that training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC