You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: More Opinion Pieces [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
39. More Opinion Pieces
A few more opinions critical of Scalia


  1. From Edward Lazarus, at Findlaw:

    http://writ.news.findlaw.com/lazarus/20040205.html

    Lazarus interprets Scalia's service to the Court charitably, but still criticizes the failure to recuse and calls for Scalia to change his mind. Hmmm.


  2. A Letter to the Editor at the Globe makes the Case for impeachment:

    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2004/03/24/challenging_scalias_actions/

    Reasonable. Points to Article 3, section 1, which states that Judges "shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour."


  3. The editors of the San Antonio Express-News make the point that the hunting trip was easily avoidable--in case you missed that from reading Scalia's opinion. It's an embarassment, alright.

    http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/editorials/stories/MYSA24.06B.scalia2ed0324.168c3301.html

  4. Here's a piece by Grist columnist Amanda Griscom

    http://www.gristmagazine.com/muck/muck032304.asp

    Griscom concludes that although Scalia is behaving reprehensibly, the Scalia affair is in the final analysis a sideshow from the Cheney scandal. Personally, I'm having a hard time telling where one stops and the other begins. Impeach Scalia, and it won't be an issue.

  5. E.J. Dionne says Scalia's right:

    http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=16634

    That is, his impartiality can't be questioned--it can't even be imagined.

    Take Griscom's piece, and instead of consulting the lawyers from Sierra and Judicial Watch, think about it in terms of constitutional government, and that should lead you towards Dionne's conclusion:

    This is a scandal. Because of ideological connivance across the branches of our political system, we are abandoning the checks and balances that make our government work.


  6. Finally, a lark of sorts. Scalia in his memorandum admitted to "promissory fraud" against the airlines.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/24/opinion/24AYRE.html?ex=1080709200&en=5c44fb6f7602ccdb&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC