You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Howard Zinn says NO [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Sushi_lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Howard Zinn says NO
The not-so-impartial historian :)

provided reputable references indicating the Japanese wanted to negotiate a surrender before the 1st bomb. The Japanese initiated discussion but the U.S. ignored those communiques.

There was a faction of Pentagon and military strategists who wanted to use the bomb as a demonstration of power to the Russians.

That faction influenced the huge estimate of expected U.S. troop losses on "island to island" fighting if the bomb was not dropped.

===

we all choose what we want to believe. I have not found disproof of ANY of Howard Zinn's factual material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC