You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #85: so what because it is a different topic [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
beachman Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. so what because it is a different topic
Maybe it's difficult for you to see the difference, but the fact that Bush may see this as a holy war is significant, but as you pointed out, the motives are probably there regardless of the religious overlapping motive.

Same with a lot of this stuff. Fact is there are Bible-believers and literalists who do not take the same stance politically. I think what you are doing is equating the neocon foreign policy approach with fundamentalism and the 2 are not related.

The reason most literalists are fairly conservative voters probably has much more to do with social and moral issues such as the porn thing someone mentioned, or abortion, or stuff like that, and I think it is a fair assessment to talk about those things in connection with religious fundamentalism.

But to state that backing those things is tantamount to support for genital mutiliation or honor killing or some extreme things, that someone on this thread mentioned, is just not correct.

I think there is a valid point on support of Israel being linked to fundamentalism, but to claim Iraq or Bush's approach on the war on terror is somehow an outgrowth of fundamentalism is just silly.

Heck, need I remind you that LBJ who led us into Vietnam, or expanded our role via the Gulf of Tonkin incident was no Bush-type of person despite both being Texans. So anyone of a particular persuasion can develop these problems and issues.

To call people that believe the Bible is true, or the word of God, or whatever, and demonize this massive voter group is just plain stupid, and a big reason the democratic party has become the minority party.

I mean come on. Bush can hardly string a few sentences together, and yet he won, or came close enough to get in there. Ever wonder that just maybe, just maybe, suggesting to large portions of Americans that they are ignorant idiots due to their religion is not the best way to win an election.

The biggest indicator last election that someone would vote for Bush was church attendance.

Think about it.

Ranting from the sidelines may be fun, but it doesn't win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC