You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Clancy remark about secret off-budget black-ops [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 03:10 PM
Original message
Tom Clancy remark about secret off-budget black-ops
Advertisements [?]
Tom Clancy was on Charlie Rose last night (I saw the rerun today), and he mentioned that the only way to keep black-ops really secret was to fund them outside the regular budget, which is subject to audits and Congressional oversight (or is supposed to be).

Clancy is just a novelist (and I haven't read his books), but he seems to know something about the murky underworld. He's gung-ho Bush* and gung-ho black-ops. He says he knows lots of good CIA people, but that the CIA is too restricted in what it can do, and too bureaucratic. He thinks there need to be unaccountable groups that can work under the radar, and without the rules--he sounds like a charter-member of PNAC, a pure Straussian. So my point is, if Clancy thinks this, can Wolfowitz et al. be far behind? This is a rhetorical question--these are the Iran-Contra people, after all.

The reference to "off-budget" also made me wonder--I've always thought the DoD was rather complacent, taking criticism about the missing $trillion or so without defending its "sloppiness," except to say it was a big organization, etc. Clancy also bragged about guessing right about one secret project, which was "something that flies fast"--so not a small budget item. And with SO much money to play around with, imagine what trouble these guys could be getting into. Imagine that they are NOT stupid about accounting and bookkeeping. Imagine what we might find out if the military had to come clean about how that money was spent and is being spent....

I may be wrong. But if "follow the money" is how to catch "terrorists," it is probably also the way to get our country back, so that unimaginable things are not being done in our name.

I started this thread because I can't help wondering about these bombings in Iraq. I'm trying to stay open-minded, but I really am afraid that control over what we do as a nation may have slipped even farther from us than we ever thought. A $trillion slush fund can do a LOT of damage. It could even fund a wholly private army (I think).

Just wondering. Is it already impossible to follow that money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC