You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to solve the prescription drug problem [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
zoidberg Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 08:53 AM
Original message
How to solve the prescription drug problem
Advertisements [?]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29306-2003Aug21.html

Great editorial on a prescription drug pricing idea in the Washinton Post today by a Northwestern University professor. The problem today with prescription drugs is that they are priced at a level that many people simply can't afford. But if we impose limits on what drug companies can charge, they will have a hard time recouping the massive R&D costs associated with creating a new drug. People can wail about drug companies making profits all they want, but the fact is that without proper incentives, no new drugs will be developed (NIH funding is a fraction of private R&D). In reality, drug companies make money from creating the idea for new drugs. The actual production of the drugs is quite mundane, but that is where the revenue comes from. So here is the solution:

First, massive awards would be made to the developers of safe and effective new patented pharmaceuticals. In effect, government would purchase drug patents; developers of successful new drugs would be rewarded for successful R&D. Second, use of the patents would be freely offered to any firms wishing to produce the pills. This would ensure active competition among generic producers and low prices, as competition forced prices down toward their low marginal production cost.
The two elements of the process, R&D and pill production, would be separated. Consumers would get low prices, and innovators would get financial awards.


There are some major potential problems with the impementation of this program (determining the size of the award, making sure the system isn't abused...), but there is no reason why the details can't be worked out. Would it be too expensive? Does this reek of corporate welfare? Should government scientists research all new drugs? What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC