You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Iraqnam and the hardliners [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
23. Iraqnam and the hardliners
Mayberry Machiavelli

You sound like you lived through the Vietnam fiasco. I was between ten and twenty when the war was going on (1H student deferrment) but guy in my dorm was drafted in 1972. The war ended mainly because we refused to fund it anymore. The picture above is from an Evergreen air helicopter and I believe from the CIA station, not the embassy. Read "Decent Interval" by Frank Snepp and also David Butler's excellent "Fall of Saigon". The real wackjob was a Democrat, Ambassador Graham A. Martin, at the time in S.Vietnam. In 1965 while he was ambassador to Thailand his adopted son Glenn Dill Mann was KIA in Vietnam immediately after the Ia Drang battle. Mann was a helicopter copilot. This deeply affected the ambassador (JFK appointed him to Thailand Nov 1, 1963 oddly enough...BTW, Wm. 'Wild Bill' Donovan was Thailand ambassador in the 50's). Later Nixon appointed Martin ambassador to Italy (the Golden Triangle was really taking off by now '69) and funding for the war was starting to get more and more difficult. By '73-74 Martin is installed in Saigon as ambassador and is pushing for around $500million at the end. The first oil crisis had hit and Pentagon people were worried more about how they would get gas enought to get to work !

Anyhow, Iraqnam as you put it will end the same. A long occupation that cannot win hearts and minds followed by a cutoff of funding. Congress will ignore public dissent; too much oil money and war profits to be made.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC