You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #66: ENEMY combatants ARE covered by the GC though the neoCONs argue NOT [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. ENEMY combatants ARE covered by the GC though the neoCONs argue NOT
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 11:33 PM by bpilgrim
ILLEGAL COMBATANTS, just like imperial japan argued during WWII :puke:

but i notice even the officials use BOTH terms, mostly the 'ENEMY' term unless pressed for WHY then aren't THEY accorded the rules of the GC, then they'll go on about how they're actually ILLEGAL combatants :argh:

but TECHNICALLY both classifications are accounted for in the GC as imperial japan and fascist germany taught us how EVIL men can be!

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC